Best Noise Reduction Software for Photographers (2026)

Noise reduction software lets you rescue images you’d otherwise have to throw away. I’ve been testing the main options, DxO PureRAW, Topaz Photo, Adobe Lightroom Classic, and ON1 NoNoise AI, on my own RAW files since 2021, across high-ISO wildlife on the Canon EOS R5 and low-light indoor and wedding shots on the Canon EOS 6D.

As a professional photographer who also teaches photography online, I rely on these tools as part of my normal workflow. A computer science degree means I also enjoy testing software, and a noise reduction round-up is the cleanest excuse I get to combine the two.

For this guide I’ve sat down with the current version of each product, Topaz Photo, DxO PureRAW 6, ON1 NoNoise AI 2024.5, and Adobe Lightroom Classic 15.3, and run the same six images through every one of them. If you just want a buying recommendation, the verdicts are right below. If you want the side-by-side test images, speed numbers and feature comparison, scroll down past them.

Quick Take: Our Verdicts for 2026

Use case	Pick	Price (2026)	Why
High-ISO wildlife, toughest low-light files	DxO PureRAW 6	$139.99 new (perpetual); $89.99 upgrade	DxO’s DeepPRIME models produced the most natural feather and skin detail in my tests (tested with XD2s on PureRAW 5; v6 ships XD3 across all sensors). Runs in 5-7 seconds per image on a decent GPU, and you pay once.
One app for denoise plus everything around it	Topaz Photo	$199 / $399 / $599 per year (subscription)	Autopilot analysis, masking-aware sharpening, and a bundle of other AI tools (upscale, recover faces, balance colour, healing brush) in one app. Subscription-only since September 2025, which makes it a harder cold-start recommendation than it used to be.
Already on Adobe’s Photography Plan	Adobe Lightroom Classic 15.3	Included with subscription ($19.99/month 1TB plan)	Denoise AI now runs as a background process and supports proper batch processing (April 2026). Quality is good enough that most subscribers won’t need a separate denoise tool. Won’t quite match DxO on the very highest-ISO files, but it’s bundled with the subscription you’re already paying for.
Budget, no Lightroom subscription	ON1 NoNoise AI 2024.5	$69.99 (perpetual)	Cheapest one-off price, perpetual licence, and the snappiest interface in the test (GPU performance comparable to Lightroom in my tests). Image quality is a step behind DxO and Topaz on the toughest files, and the product line has been on the 2024 version since August 2024.

 

What We’ve Learned From Four Years of Testing

The hardware story matters as much as the software. A current GPU takes a 45-megapixel R5 image from around 90 seconds of denoise time down to 5-10. AI-aware CPUs (the ones with NPUs) help with the analysis stage, but a dedicated graphics card is where the actual denoise speed comes from.

The image-quality gap between the top three (DxO, Topaz, Lightroom) has closed to the point where you’ll only see the difference on pixel-level inspection of the highest-ISO files. ON1 is a step behind on image quality but cheaper than all of them, and its interface is the snappiest in everyday use.

If you’re choosing today, the decision is mostly about how the tool fits the workflow you already use, not which one denoises best in isolation. A Lightroom subscriber who already has Photography Plan running can stay with Lightroom Denoise 15.3 and get good results without paying for a second tool. A wildlife or low-light specialist hitting the highest ISOs will see a real gain from DxO PureRAW 6’s XD3 model. Topaz Photo earns its keep when you also want upscaling, face recovery, and other AI tools in the same app.

Below, I go through what to look for in a noise reduction tool, then a full review of each of the four products, then the six-image head-to-head test, speed and file-size numbers, and a final summary. First though, let’s run through what noise and noise reduction actually are in photography, and why a dedicated tool can be worth it.

 

What is “Noise” in Photography?

Noise appears as random colour or brightness variations across an image, which can give it a grainy or splotched appearance on close inspection.

There are two types of noise in digital photography, colour noise and luminance noise. The former appears as colored speckles and the latter appears as a grainy effect. You can see both types of noise in the below image.

Both types of noise appear in some form in all digital images, however there are a number of factors which can cause increased noise.

The first of these is the ISO setting of your camera. As a general rule and all else being equal, the higher the ISO, the noisier the image will be.

This is because the ISO setting works a bit like the gain on an amplifier. As you increase the gain on an amplifier, the sound gets louder, but any errors or unwanted sounds also get amplified.

As you increase the ISO on a camera sensor, the chance of random errors being recorded also increases. Images shot in lower light tend to be noisier due to the high ISOs used in these scenes.

The size of the sensor and the physical size of the pixels recording the light on the sensor also contribute to image noise. Smaller sensors with higher megapixel counts tend to create noisier images. Larger sensors with smaller megapixel counts tend to create less noisy images.

Whilst noise is normally undesirable in photography, there may be times where a photographer doesn’t mind noise in a photo or even wants it. For example, if trying to achieve a certain effect for a vintage or grungy style of photo, noise might be of value.

However, noise is generally something most photographers want to avoid. When it can’t be avoided in camera by using low ISOs, then you will want to use noise reduction software to remove it from your processed image files.

 

What is Noise Reduction in Photography?

Noise reduction is basically the removal of digital noise which can appear in an image.

Because noise is random, it normally appears all across an image in an arbitrary manner. This makes removing noise a bit of a challenge, as the noise reduction tool needs to be able to correctly identify which pixels are unwanted noise, and which are actually part of the image. The unwanted noise pixels should be replaced with pixels that blend into the existing image without leaving an obvious patch.

Too much noise reduction can result in lost image detail, giving an image a soft, almost plastic look. Too little noise reduction means your images can look like a grainy speckled mess.

Good noise reduction should result in a clean noise-free image that looks natural.

 

Do You Need Noise Reduction?

Whilst noise reduction is important to ensure your images look their best, running dedicated noise reduction software is not necessary for every photographer. It depends a lot on what you will be using your photos for.

This is because when you resize an image to a smaller size, it becomes a lot harder to see the noise. If you primarily share your images on the web and on social media sites where they are normally viewed at a fraction of their original size, then the benefits of dedicated noise reduction tools will be far less obvious. Your photo editing software’s built-in noise reduction will generally do a good enough job.

However, if you plan to enlarge your images, print them out, or are regularly tightly cropping your images (such as with wildlife photography), then noise reduction can become very useful.

 

What to Look for in Noise Reduction Software

Before evaluating each piece of noise reduction software and comparing them, I want to go through the various features that noise reduction software offers so you know what to consider when comparing the available options.

 

Noise Reduction Performance

Of course, the first thing to look for in noise reduction software is how well it actually performs. I’ll be testing each piece of noise reduction software on my images and sharing my thoughts in this post to give you some pointers. However, I strongly urge you to do some testing of your own with your own image files from your own camera.

This is because every camera and lens combination will output slightly different results, and you will definitely want to test how your setup works with your noise reduction software. The software also performs differently depending on your hardware setup, so it’s important to check that for your computer system as well.

Finally, what counts as “good” noise reduction is quite subjective, like many things in photography. What looks great to me might look too soft or artificial to you, and vice versa. Testing the software against your images and adjusting the settings to see what the output looks like on your files is the only way to know for sure. You can download trial versions of each version of the software, and many of them also come with a money back guarantee.

Here are links to each noise reduction application on test so you can download them and test them out yourself.

• DxO PureRAW
• Topaz Photo
• On1 NoNoise AI 2024
• Adobe Lightroom Classic 15.3

Note that Lightroom is not a dedicated noise reduction tool. I’m using it in this post primarily as a comparison as it’s the photo editing application of choice for many photographers and it has built-in noise reduction tools.

 

RAW / JPG Support

You would normally look to reduce the noise in your images as early in your photo editing workflow as possible. Assuming you are shooting in RAW, this means that the noise reduction tool you are using will need to support the RAW format that your camera produces.

Every camera manufacturer has their own RAW file format, and these can differ between camera models from the same manufacturer. For example, Canon have CR2 and CR3 files, Nikon have NEF files and Sony has ARW files.

Any photo editing application, including noise reduction software, needs to be able to read the RAW file in order to make any changes to it. So, when you are evaluating noise reduction software, you will want to check that it supports your camera model.

If it doesn’t, there is the option to convert the RAW file into a more universal RAW format like Adobe’s DNG format. Alternatively, you can use an edited format like TIFF, and apply noise reduction a little later on in your editing workflow. More on when to apply noise reduction in another part of this guide.

Note that noise reduction tools can also sometimes work with photos not shot in RAW, such as JPG files from smartphones. The results are likely to be less impressive as these files will already have been processed, and some form of noise reduction will likely already have been applied.

However, as many folks do have images in compressed formats, if this is important to you then make sure you choose a program which also supports editing JPG files as well as RAW files.

 

Price

Whilst the noise reduction performance of the software is obviously important, price is something you’ll want to factor in when you choose the right software for you.

Noise reduction software is available at a range of prices, starting from around $70 USD up to around $200.

Buying a piece of software that focuses on one function might seem like an extravagance, or you might feel it’s an essential purchase. When comparing prices, definitely compare the performance of the product as well as additional features to see if it’s the right option for you.

In some cases, the noise reduction software might also be sold as part of a more full-featured photo editing application which is available for a little bit more. This will normally have a full range of photo editing tools, as well as the noise reduction capabilities of the standalone software.

For example, On1 sells their NoNoise AI tool as a standalone product, but it’s also part of the On1 PhotoRAW product. This latter is one of our favourite Lightroom alternatives for photo editing and photo management, and it’s only around $30 more for the full suite.

Instead of spending $69.99 for a product that does one thing, you could spend a bit more on a product which does many things including noise reduction. If you are already in the market for a photo editor, this can be an excellent option.

 

GPU / AI Acceleration

Noise reduction, as I’ve already alluded to, is a complicated process. The noise reduction tool needs to correctly identify the two types of noise (colour noise and luminance noise), and then remove them from the image.

However, obviously it can’t just delete the pixels – they need to be replaced with something else. A digital image isn’t made up of layers, so where you delete a pixel there isn’t anything behind it.

Most noise reduction software works by analysing the area around noisy pixels and using that analysis to decide what to replace the noisy pixels with.

This analysis is key to getting good results and is why some noise reduction software can result in a plastic and overly smoothed look. If you are working with details of skin or feathers, the replaced noise pixels need to fit the existing texture, so the result looks natural.

This pixel level image analysis takes a huge amount of processing power, and the higher your camera’s megapixel count, the longer it will take as the tool has to analyse more pixels.

To improve the speed at which they work, many noise reduction tools leverage the power of a specialized bit of hardware inside your computer.

There are two main types of hardware that can be used to improve the speed at which a noise reduction tool works, a GPU or an AI processor.

 

GPU Accelerated Noise Reduction

The most common hardware  for noise reduction tools to utilize is a Graphics Processing Unit, or GPU. These are also commonly called graphics cards.

Graphics cards are a specially designed piece of hardware inside a computer which are commonly used for graphically intensive workloads such as computer games. However, they can also be utilized for other specific tasks, such as image manipulation.

Whilst a computer’s central processing unit, or CPU, can also handle these tasks, their general-purpose nature means they aren’t usually as fast at it as a dedicated graphics processor. A high-end graphics card will often be orders of magnitude faster at these specific tasks than a fast CPU.

 

AI Accelerated Noise Reduction

More recent developments (2023 onwards) have seen dedicated AI processing chips added to computers. These are generally found as part of more recent processors from Intel and AMD.

These chips are designed to accelerate AI tasks, and as you will have noticed, most noise reduction software includes the word “AI” in the title.

So it stands to reason that a computer with a dedicated AI processor would be able to handle these tasks faster.

 

Performance Improvement with AI / GPU Processing in Noise Reduction

In my testing with both a GPU and an AMD AI enabled CPU, the performance improvement with either AI or GPU acceleration is significant compared to just using a CPU. Performance gains are anywhere from four to fourteen times quicker!

That makes a big difference, as you are talking about image processing taking 7 – 10 seconds rather than a minute (or longer!). If you are processing a lot of files, this makes a huge difference to your workflow.

However, the noise reduction software does need to be specially coded in order to support offloading tasks to the AI processor or GPU instead of the CPU.

If you have an AI processor or graphics card in your desktop or laptop computer that you want to utilize for noise reduction tasks, you’ll want to be sure to purchase noise reduction software which supports this type of acceleration.

This is normally made clear in the promotional material, and there will also usually be options within the software to enable or disable the feature.

AI processors are very new and as of the time of writing only Topaz Photo appears to support AI processing, which it appears to use for the analysis phase of the noise reduction process.

GPU processors are a much more established technology and the majority of noise reduction tools on the market support these processors. In my testing, a recent GPU performs much better for the actual image processing than either a CPU with an AI processor or a regular CPU.

With this in mind, I’d normally advise buying noise reduction software which does include GPU acceleration, even if you don’t have a graphics card right now, as it future proofs you should you upgrade to a GPU at a later date.

If you have an existing graphics card, do compare performance between using the GPU and just using the CPU. In some cases, especially if you have a newer CPU and an older GPU, the CPU might actually be faster.

If you are in the market for a new computer, check out my guide to the best laptops for photo editing. Many of these have built-in GPUs to help you get the most out of your photo editing applications.

 

Batch Editing

If you often work with a large number of similar images, then you will want to think about the batch editing options that the noise reduction software offers.

For example, you might be a wedding photographer who has taken lots of shots of an event or a wildlife photographer with multiple shots of animals.

Whilst you might be happy to sit down and tweak the noise in every image individually, the chances are that many of your images will be similar enough that you’ll be applying similar settings to all of them. Tools like Lightroom allow you to apply the same edits to multiple images at once, so this sort of feature is handy to look for in noise reduction software too.

Noise reduction software can also take time to run, so the option to load up multiple images as a batch and have them process whilst you do something else can also be a real benefit.

 

Automation and Control

Another feature to look at is what level of automation the tool offers. This will vary depending on the software. It might be a one-click solution, where you simply load the image and noise reduction is applied entirely automatically with minimal user input. Alternatively, it might require fully manual editing of various sliders.

Ideally, the software will come with a best of both worlds approach. There should be a fully automatic mode, where the software performs an analysis of the image and suggests the correct settings. Then you should have the option to adjust and tweak to suit your needs.

Of course, you might prefer a more manual or more automated approach. It’s up to you. The main thing is to pick the software that fits into your workflow.

 

AI Features

You will have noticed that the word “AI” is tacked on to the end of some of the products in our round-up today. This stands for “Artificial Intelligence”, and suggests that these specific tools are capable of something a bit special.

Here’s what’s actually happening. When these manufacturers refer to AI, what they mean is that their software has been trained using something called machine deep learning. Basically, the software has been presented with millions of images, to get an idea of what a good noise-free image looks like and what a bad noisy image looks like.

When you load up your noisy image, this machine learning helps the tool figure out, based on its extensive training on the millions of images in its dataset, which areas of your image are noisy and what to replace them with.

This can result in far more natural and impressive results than the more traditional pixel level analysis, where nearby pixels are used to blend in to existing pixels. However, it can also sometimes get it wrong, leading to less than impressive results.

Overall, my testing leads me to recommend a noise reduction tool with AI capabilities, as the results on the whole tend to be more impressive. However, I do recommend you test any tool out before making a final decision.

 

Masking

In photography, masking essentially refers to an area of the photo that you have selected in an editing application. Once you have selected, or “masked” an area, you can choose to only apply edits to that area. You can also invert the mask, and apply edits everywhere else.

Most photo editing tools come with range of masking options, and it’s something I cover in detail in the editing section of my online photography course.

Some noise reduction software also offers masking controls. These allow you to more carefully define which areas of the image you want to apply noise reduction to. This is helpful especially with some of the AI powered tools which don’t always get it perfect, meaning you can tweak the results.

 

Plugins for other Photo Apps

Many photographers looking for noise reduction software already have an existing photography workflow in place. That means you probably already use a photo editing application like Adobe Lightroom to edit and manage your photos.

If so, finding a noise reduction tool that fits into your existing setup will make your photo editing workflow a little bit easier. Many noise reduction tools ship with plugins for Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop, which is arguably the most common photo management and editing product on the market.

A plugin makes it easier to send an image from Lightroom to the noise reduction tool, apply the noise reduction, and then have the adjusted image come back to Lightroom where you can continue to work on it.

Some software also ships with plugins for other software, like Capture One or On1 Photo RAW, but as these are less commonly used, this isn’t as standard.

Of course, a plugin isn’t totally necessary, and you can still use noise reduction tools entirely standalone without a plugin. But it is a nice to have feature.

 

Additional Features

When evaluating noise reduction tools and their price, it’s good to compare any additional features they might offer on top of noise reduction.

For example, some tools include built-in lens profile correction and image sharpening tools. As these are common tasks to perform on most images, having these built into the noise reduction tool can simplify your workflow.

These aren’t generally deal breakers, but if you are struggling to decide between two similar products, features like this might be where your decision is made.

 

Where in Your Workflow to Use Noise Reduction Software

You might be wondering which point in your photography workflow is best to apply noise reduction.

In my opinion, you want to apply noise reduction as early as possible.

This is because as you start to edit the photo, you apply changes to the image which are also applied to the noise. For the noise reduction software to be most effective, running it on an unedited RAW photo means it can get to work on the unadulterated version of the image.

As previously mentioned, you can also sometimes run noise reduction tools on JPG files, however this will not yield the best results compared to using them on RAW files as JPG files are already processed.

Each noise reduction tool will normally have a recommendation as to the best point in your workflow to run it for the best results. However, you might have a specific workflow that you prefer. For example, if you are planning to crop your images, you might prefer to crop first and then just apply noise reduction to the cropped area of the image.

Noise reduction can be a time intensive process, so you can save time by only reducing noise on the area of the image you intend to use. You might also prefer to make some basic tonal edits in your photo editing application before removing noise.

In my testing, there is not a huge difference between using noise reduction before doing any editing, versus applying noise reduction after doing some basic edits. However, you should be careful of any default settings applied.

For example, Lightroom applies both colour noise reduction and sharpening to images automatically when you load them. In my experience, you need to turn these adjustments off before sending the image to the noise reduction tool to do its best work.

Depending on the noise reduction tool you choose, you might not have a choice, as some will only work on RAW files prior to editing them.

 

Noise Reduction Software

There are a number of noise reduction products on the market today. I’ve picked four of my favourites to review in this guide. In each case I’ve used the most recent available version of the software.

If these products update in any way that meaningfully changes how they perform, I’ll update this guide accordingly.

I have primarily focused on standalone noise reduction tools in this round-up, on the assumption that you already have an image editor you use. However, some of these tools are also available as part of a photo editing application, so if you are also looking for a photo editor then one of these options might make more sense.

I’d also recommend reading my guide to the best photo editing applications on the market for more suggestions. I’ve also included Lightroom as it’s a popular tool with many photographers, and it has noise reduction tools built-in.

It’s also worth noting that in some cases, you get more control over the noise reduction process with the full photo editor compared to the standalone noise reduction tool. This is because the standalone tools are designed to slot into an existing workflow and just get the job done with minimal user intervention.

However, if you prefer to have more control over your editing process from end to end, this is something to keep in mind when evaluating.

First, I’m going to go over all four options and outline their features and pros and cons. Then, I’ll look at how each software actually performs, both in terms of the images produced, and also in terms of processing speed and file size output.

 

Topaz Photo

Topaz Labs have been making image improvement tools for a long time. Up until around 2022/2023, these tools were separate products which fulfilled different functions, namely Topaz DeNoise AI for noise reduction, Topaz Sharpen AI for sharpening, and Topaz Gigapixel AI for upscaling.

In 2023, most of these standalone products were consolidated into a single app called Topaz Photo AI. In 2024, the “AI” was dropped from the name and the product became Topaz Photo. The most recent change came in September 2025, when Topaz Labs retired perpetual licences entirely and moved Topaz Photo to subscription-only pricing. A Pro tier was added in 2026, sitting above the existing Personal tier.

This is an all-in-one product which can handle noise reduction, image sharpening, image upscaling and more, with around a dozen AI tools bundled in (denoise, sharpen, upscale, recover faces, balance colour, healing brush and others). Topaz Gigapixel still ships as a separate standalone product despite the 2023 consolidation, since it serves a different upscaling-focused workflow.

As Topaz DeNoise is no longer available for purchase, this review will be focusing on Topaz Photo. I will primarily be focusing on the denoise feature, but when comparing this tool to other tools be aware that it also has significant other capabilities, including image upscaling, the ability to recover blurry images and more.

The tool heavily leverages machine learning to analyse and suggest improvements for your image. Topaz Labs train their AI engine using millions of images. It compares your image against this dataset in order to get the best results for your image.

In terms of where it fits in your workflow, Topaz usually recommends running Topaz Photo before you make any other changes to your image. However, they do also say that you can run Topaz Photo wherever you want in your workflow and it should work fine.

Topaz Labs provides a plugin for Lightroom. It also offers two options for sending images from Lightroom, you can either send the unedited RAW file, or you can send the image over to Topaz for denoising at any point in your editing workflow. If you choose to do the latter, I suggest turning off the default sharpening and noise reduction in Lightroom before you send the image to Topaz Photo.

You can also load RAW or JPG files (as well as various other compressed file formats) directly into Topaz Photo if you prefer.

Topaz Photo is a very smart tool with a number of features. When you first open an image, it runs an Autopilot tool. This analyses your image and attempts to figure out exactly what improvements are required. It also analyses and detects subjects, faces and text in the image.

Once it has analyzed the image, it will select improvements which include upscaling, noise reduction, face recovery, and sharpening.

Note you can disable the Autopilot tool entirely and do your own edits, but in my testing it does a pretty good job so can be left on. You can also always adjust the filters it recommends.

For options, Topaz Photo has a lot of controls to offer. Of course, you can just choose to use the preselected choices for each improvement that the Autopilot tools loads. However, you can also turn each of these options on or off and adjust the strength manually. Over time, the software will keep track of the style you prefer and adjust its recommendations accordingly.

As well as the global adjustments, Topaz Photo comes with a masking tool. However, this only applies to the sharpening feature rather than the noise reduction.

This actually makes sense, as normally you want to remove noise across the whole image and then selectively sharpen the subject. By default, Topaz Photo selects the subject for you, but you can adjust this to sharpen areas of interest or the whole image.

Topaz Photo also has batch editing, so you can load a number of images into the software, adjust the settings, and then batch process them. The only downside of this is that you do need to load up and preview each image to trigger the AI analysis prior to running the noise reduction.

You can’t just load up a bunch of images and hit a button – there is still some work to be done before you can process all the images. If you want batch processing with minimal input, I’d suggest checking out DxO PureRAW.

The good news is that Topaz Photo is designed to be performant. By default, it only loads a part of the image you are working on, and it displays the noise reduction of that area rather than applying noise reduction to the whole image. It’s also GPU and AI accelerated, meaning it takes advantage of either your AI processor or your graphics card (or both) to improve performance.

The downside is that if you pan around the image or change the output settings, the image preview has to be regenerated which takes a bit of time.

I do like the interface and the various options Topaz Photo has for displaying the preview. You can choose a split screen view, where you move a slider to quickly switch between the original and the edited version. You can also choose a side-by-side view, with the original file on one side and the edited version on the other.

Once you have your image settings dialed in, either manually or you are happy with the automatic settings chosen by the AI, you can process the image.

Time wise, this will vary depending on the size of the image and the amount of noise. The power of your computer and any GPU or AI processor you have installed will also make a massive difference.

As of 2026, Topaz Photo is still the only noise reduction tool I’ve tested which makes use of an NPU (AI processor) if your system has one.

In my testing, an AI processor definitely improves the speed of the initial load and analysis of the image. However, the noise reduction export is still significantly faster with a dedicated GPU.

You can choose which to use, and it’s definitely worth testing your own system with the different options. Generally, the Auto option (which decides for you) will give you the best results, leveraging the capabilities of your system as required.

Supporting both options is definitely a nice future proof feature, but in my testing a dedicated GPU is going to be the fastest option for noise reduction in Topaz Photo.

With a dedicated GPU, expect the actual noise reduction process to take in the region of 10- 20 seconds (time will vary depending on your exact configuration and file size). With a regular CPU, expect processing to take around a minute or more.

In terms of results, Topaz Photo was consistently near or at the top in terms of the image quality in my tests, which you can see further on in this post.

Overall, I really like Topaz Photo for noise reduction and general image improvements. The interface is very clean, it works well, and the results are great. I like that it integrates with Lightroom or can be used on its own. It also has plenty of control options, even though the automatic settings work well the majority of the time.

The Topaz team are also spending a lot of time and effort improving the software, with releases almost every week with new features and capabilities.

The downside however is that you are paying for more than just noise reduction.

In previous years, you could buy a standalone noise reduction tool from Topaz for around $79 USD. Then Topaz Photo arrived with a perpetual price of $199.

Since September 2025, Topaz Photo has been subscription-only, which weakens the value proposition compared to the perpetual era. Pricing now runs as three tiers: Personal $199/year ($27/month on annual billing, $39/month month-to-month), Pro $599/year ($40/month annual, $58/month monthly) which adds higher-end cloud-based features and models on top of the Personal-tier tools, and Studio $399/year sitting in between. You’re committed to keeping the subscription live to keep using the tool, which is a meaningful change for anyone who paid the original one-off price.

Topaz Photo is a powerful and well-rounded tool, but you’re paying significantly more for the extra features it bundles in beyond noise reduction.

If you want a tool that does everything it offers and embraces the latest technologies, this is a great option.

Price: Personal $199/year, Pro $599/year, Studio $399/year (all subscription)
Plugins: Lightroom Classic, Photoshop, Capture One, Apple Photos, Affinity Photo
GPU / AI Accelerated: Yes, both GPU and AI acceleration
Consider If: You’re looking for a powerful yet easy to use noise reduction tool that delivers great results, and you don’t mind paying a subscription
Don’t Consider If: You don’t need the extra features it offers, or you’d rather pay once and own the software
Trial Available: Yes, download here

 

On1 NoNoise AI 2024

On1 NoNoise AI is a standalone noise reduction tool from On1, who make a range of photo editing software including On1 Photo RAW.

On1 designed NoNoise AI from the ground up to be one of the fastest noise reduction tools on the market, a goal they appear to have achieved as you’ll see in the tests a little further on in the post.

Like Topaz Photo with Autopilot, when you first load NoNoise AI it applies the noise reduction to the whole image when you load it. As you pan around the image and adjust the sliders it updates the preview, which happens very quickly. In fact, in my testing, On1 NoNoise has one of the snappiest feeling interfaces of any noise reduction tool I’ve used.

Once the image is loaded, you can adjust the noise reduction settings and sharpening or leave them on the automatically adjusted settings. You can preview your changes in real time, and use a split screen view to compare the original and your edit. Once you’ve got the noise reduction and sharpening dialled in, you then have the option to further refine the noise reduction using the masking tools, and you can also crop your image.

On1’s masking tools are by far the most powerful of all the dedicated noise reduction tools in this round up. As well as manually masking using a brush, there’s an AI powered subject selection mask, radial masks and graduated masks. There’s even luminosity masking.

That’s not all though. The tool also comes with On1’s subject removal and heal tools, so you can remove unwanted objects as well. There’s also layer support, giving you even more flexibility over your editing.

I’ll be honest, whilst these features are nice to have, most people are going to be buying this tool for noise reduction. Having extra features is nice, but most users will likely find them in their main photo editing application.

Since the noise reduction engine used by On1 NoNoise is the same as the one which is used by On1 Photo RAW, if you want those kinds of tools, you would be better off opting for the full product. It’s only a little bit more expensive, and you get all the editing controls as well as image management tools.

One thing I did notice with the DNG files output by On1 NoNoise AI is that they lost my lens and camera profile, so Lightroom couldn’t apply any auto corrections. This is slightly vexing, but hopefully something a future update will resolve.

Note that I originally tested the 2022 version of On1 NoNoise AI. Newer versions which I have since updated this post to include offer faster performance, being up to twice as fast on the same image files in my testing. The 2024 version significantly improved the sharpening feature, with a new dedicated Tack-Sharp AI system which can help fix blurry photos. I’d say if you are on the 2022 version, then upgrading to 2024 would make sense. The jump from 2023 to 2024 is less dramatic.

One thing worth flagging: the ON1 NoNoise product line has been on the 2024 version since August 2024. The current release, 2024.5, is a free update for 2024 owners that bumps the underlying build, but the year-line and the noise reduction engine haven’t shifted in nearly two years. In the same window, DxO has gone from PureRAW 4 to 6, Topaz has been rebranded twice and moved to subscription, and Adobe has shipped two major Lightroom updates with workflow changes. Whether you read that as “stable” or “starting to fall behind” depends on how much you value continuous product development.

In my testing the actual noise reduction is fairly similar between versions, but the improved speed and additional features make 2024 a worthwhile upgrade. Of all the software I tested, this has the best price-to-features ratio, although the noise reduction itself is not class leading.

Price: $69.99 (standalone perpetual licence), also available via the ON1 Everything subscription
Plugins: Lightroom Classic, Photoshop, Capture One, Apple Photos, Affinity Photo, Corel PaintShop Pro
GPU Accelerated: Yes
RAW Support: Yes
Consider If: You are looking for the fastest noise reduction tool on a budget which also has some extra features and powerful masking
Don’t Consider If: You want best-in-class noise reduction quality, or you’d prefer a tool with more frequent updates
Trial Available: Yes, download here

 

DxO PureRAW 6

I have used DxO software for a number of years, primarily for the PRIME noise reduction feature, which has always done a great job especially on skin tones and on the kind of feather detail wildlife photography lives or dies on.

So, I am definitely interested to see how DxO PureRAW stacks up against the competition.

Like On1, DxO has two versions of its noise reduction software. There’s the standalone product, DxO PureRAW, and a full-featured photo editor called DxO PhotoLab.

The noise reduction system is similar, the difference is that PureRAW focuses purely on noise reduction, whilst PhotoLab is a full featured photo editor.

PureRAW is designed to fit into your workflow before you do any other editing. It takes in completely unedited RAW files and applies DxO’s noise reduction.

By default these are output as DNG files which you can then load into your normal photo management and editing app. TIFF and JPG output is also supported.

When PureRAW was first released, it was a fairly simple tool with minimal controls. You sent it an image, it denoised it. It was very much set and forget.

However, since that first version, and likely to better compete with the fine-grained controls in other tools, each iteration has added more controls. By PureRAW v5 you could preview the results prior to processing and apply simple masks to tweak select areas. PureRAW 6, released in March 2026, builds on that by extending the top-tier DeepPRIME XD3 model to all sensors (more on that in a moment), adding an AI-driven sensor dust removal tool, and supporting a compressed DNG output that’s up to four times smaller than a standard DNG, with no quality loss.

This is quite a shift from the original way the program worked up to version 4, where minimal user input was available. Now you can choose between just letting the program do its thing or tweaking the output to your needs.

The interface above is from PureRAW 5 (which is what I used for the test images you’ll see further down). PureRAW 6 keeps the same general layout, with the new dust-removal and compressed-DNG options added to the panel.

You have a number of options for RAW processing. First, you can choose between the main DxO denoise models. The default balanced option is DeepPRIME 3, and the top-quality option is DeepPRIME XD3. The XD3 model is a notable change in PureRAW 6: it was previously exclusive to Fujifilm X-Trans sensors in PureRAW 5, and v6 has now brought it across to Bayer-sensor cameras as well (so Canon, Nikon, Sony, and most other manufacturers). XD3 replaces the older XD2s model, which was the previous top-tier for Bayer.

Previous versions of DxO PureRAW used older denoise algorithms, including DeepPRIME, HQ and PRIME, which are no longer available. In my testing, every new iteration of the algorithm has produced better results, so it makes sense that these older tools have been retired.

DxO describes DeepPRIME 3 and DeepPRIME XD3 as follows:

DeepPRIME 3 (introduced in PureRAW 5) is a deep-learning model that eliminates noise and restores detail without compromising image quality. It includes chromatic aberration correction at the pixel level as part of the RAW conversion process.

DeepPRIME XD3 (extended to Bayer sensors in PureRAW 6) is DxO’s highest-quality model, producing more detailed results than DeepPRIME 3 on noisy or high-ISO files, at the cost of a longer processing time.

Both options require a fast GPU to get good results, otherwise your experience is going to be very slow.

For both, you can adjust the strength of the effect with the “luminance” and “force details” sliders. You can tweak these and preview the results prior to processing the image.

As well as noise reduction, PureRAW also has the option to apply lens corrections and lens sharpening. These correct for common issues like chromatic aberration, lens distortions and vignetting. DxO have a huge database of lens and camera combinations, so the settings are tailored to the setup for each image.

From version 4 of the software onwards, you get some control over these adjustments. There are four options for sharpening to compensate for lens softness, from soft to hard, as well as a fifth custom option where you can adjust the sharpness manually. You can also turn it off completely, and you can also selectively enable or disable chromatic aberration, vignetting and lens distortion correction.

PureRAW is designed as a batch processor, so the idea is that you load all your images into DxO PureRAW, pick which model to apply, and then process the images. Then you load them into your photo editing application.

As of version 3, you can set up different queues for different settings, so depending on the images you are processing you can apply different noise reduction or sharpening options.

The only thing that is missing is an automated analysis of your image to provide recommended settings, like the Autopilot feature in Topaz Photo.

As it is, you have to choose the images you want to process with a specific noise algorithm and batch those together, which makes the workflow a bit less efficient. In my testing, some images definitely benefit from the DeepPRIME 3 model, whilst others look better with DeepPRIME XD3 (XD2s, on PureRAW 5).

Price wise, DxO PureRAW sits between On1 NoNoise AI and Topaz Photo, although the latter offers more features. PureRAW 6 is $139.99 for new buyers, or $89.99 to upgrade from version 4 or 5. The licence is perpetual, so you own the version you buy.

In my testing, which you’ll see further on in this guide, DxO PureRAW consistently produced great results with minimal user interaction required.

The sharpening and lens corrections are also excellent, working particularly well on older images and across a huge range of lens and camera body combinations.

Price: $139.99 new, $89.99 upgrade from v4 or v5 (perpetual licence)
Plugins: Lightroom Classic, Photoshop (Smart Filter)
GPU Accelerated: Yes, but requires a modern GPU
RAW Support: Yes (RAW input only; outputs DNG, TIFF and JPEG)
Consider If: You want a single-click option that produces great results before your other editing, with easy batch processing
Don’t Consider If: You don’t have a good GPU, or you need to denoise JPG files (PureRAW is RAW-input only)
Trial Available: Yes, download here

 

Adobe Lightroom

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom barely needs an introduction. It’s one of the world’s most popular photo management and editing tools, and it’s also what I use for the majority of my photo editing.

As you would expect from a photo editor, Adobe Lightroom has noise reduction built in. As of version 12.3, released in April 2023, it also includes AI powered noise reduction, which offers a major leap forward in performance compared to previous versions.

By default, when you load an image into Lightroom’s editor it will remove the majority of colour noise. You can then press the Denoise button to use Lightroom’s AI powered noise reduction.

This applies the noise reduction, after which you can use as a slider to adjust the level of noise reduction from 0 (none) to 100 (lots).

As of version 14.4, released in June 2025, this feature is integrated into Lightroom’s non-destructive workflow. Prior to that, like all the other tools, Lightroom created a separate DNG file which it applied the noise reduction to. Now it happens as part of the workflow without creating a DNG file, so you don’t need to take up extra hard drive space with additional DNG files, which is a real benefit.

Lightroom Classic 15.3 (April 2026) added the other piece I’d been waiting on: background processing. Denoise (and Raw Details and Super Resolution) now runs as a background job rather than locking up the application. The image being processed is still locked for editing while its denoise pass runs, but Lightroom stays usable for other images. You can also now batch-apply Denoise via Copy/Paste, Sync, Auto-Sync, or presets across a whole shoot. The “no batch denoise” complaint I had in earlier versions of this article is no longer accurate.

The remaining downside of Adobe’s approach is that there’s no live preview before you commit. You check the Denoise box to apply it, which takes some time, and once it’s applied you can move the slider to update the strength from 0 to 100 (the strength update is quick). You can’t preview different strength values before committing the way you can in DxO or Topaz.

One caveat worth knowing: Lightroom’s AI Denoise only works on RAW files (Bayer or X-Trans mosaic). It doesn’t process JPG, TIFF or PSD files. Adobe has said they’re looking at supporting more formats, but for now it’s RAW input only. If you need to denoise JPGs out of a phone or older camera, Topaz Photo or On1 NoNoise are better fits.

If you don’t want to use the AI powered noise reduction, you can fall back to Lightroom’s older noise reduction sliders. For low-noise images they’re often good enough. For higher-noise images, AI Denoise produces noticeably better results in my testing.

The other major downside of Lightroom is that it’s subscription-only. If you’d rather pay once for a photo editor with strong built-in noise reduction, you might consider DxO PhotoLab or On1 Photo RAW.

These Lightroom alternatives offer many of the same features at a one-off price, with the advantage of powerful noise reduction tools as well.

Even so, Lightroom is still the hub of my photo management and editing workflow, as I’ve not yet found an application that does everything it does quite so well. The AI powered noise reduction is also good enough to stand up to most of the alternatives on the market in my testing.

Price (new subscribers, 2026): 1TB Photography Plan $19.99/month (includes Lightroom Classic, Lightroom, Photoshop, and 1TB cloud storage). Lightroom-only 1TB plan $11.99/month. The legacy 20GB Photography Plan at $14.99/month has been closed to new sign-ups since 15 January 2025; existing subscribers can still hold it.
Lightroom Plugin Available: N/A (it’s the host application)
GPU Accelerated: Yes, for various features including AI noise reduction
RAW Support: Yes (Bayer / X-Trans RAW only – no JPG, TIFF or PSD)
Consider If: You are looking for an all-in-one option which includes good noise reduction, particularly if you’re already on the Photography Plan
Don’t Consider If: You would prefer a one-off payment rather than a subscription, you need to denoise non-RAW files, or you want more granular control over the noise reduction process
Trial Available: Yes, download here

 

Noise Reduction Software Results Comparison

I’ll now compare a number of different images to see how the various software stacks up in the four software programs. I’ll be using unedited RAW files from my Canon EOS R5 and my Canon EOS 6D.

For DxO, I’m going to use the two output options with everything set to default (lens correction, sharpening etc).

For Topaz, I use the RAW AI model and everything else set to Auto. This means some images will have sharpening applied and others won’t, this will depend on what the Autopilot decides.

For On1, it uses the default settings.

For Lightroom, I leave the AI tool and sharpening sliders at their default settings.

All the noise reduction software applies some form of sharpening, and this has been left to the default setting. JPG files for use in this post were not sharpened when creating them from the DNG files output from each noise reduction tool.

Finally, every tool for processing RAW files has its own approach to rendering colour, brightness etc. So there will be some variations in image colour and brightness across the tools. These can be quickly adjusted when editing, so I would recommend not focusing on that, and looking at the noise and sharpness specifically for each output image.

 

Noise Reduction Software Versions in Use

It’s important when comparing tools and looking at performance benchmarks to know which versions of the software were used. Software updates can affect both the quality of the noise reduction and the speed at which it runs.

The versions used for the test images below are:

• Topaz Photo 4.0.2 (released June 2025)
• DxO PureRAW 5.2 (released June 2025) – used with DeepPRIME XD2s
• On1 NoNoise AI 2024.5 (released August 2024)
• Lightroom Classic CC 14.4 (released June 2025)

Since I generated the test images, Topaz Photo has dropped the version number from its branding, DxO has shipped PureRAW 6 (March 2026) which replaces the XD2s model with the new universal DeepPRIME XD3, and Adobe has shipped Lightroom Classic 15.3 (April 2026) with background batch processing. I’ve spot-checked individual images through the newer versions and the relative ranking has held up: DxO and Topaz still trade the top spot depending on subject, Lightroom is a strong third, and On1 is fourth on quality and joint-second on speed.

If you are an existing DxO PureRAW user wondering whether to upgrade, version 6 is a meaningful step up if you shoot Bayer-sensor cameras (Canon, Nikon, Sony), because DeepPRIME XD3 produces cleaner, more detailed results than XD2s on the hardest files. The $89.99 upgrade price from v4 or v5 is reasonable for what you get. If you only ever use DeepPRIME 3, the gains are smaller, and you can probably skip.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 1

The first image is this shot of a UK robin sitting on a branch. It was in a shaded area, and this was shot on a Canon EOS R5 at 6400 ISO. The small version doesn’t show too much noise, but if you click through to the larger version, you’ll see more noise.

No noise reduction, sharpening or other editing applied, 6400 ISO. Click image for larger version.Now, let’s look at a 100% crop of the subject, which is what we’re interested in. We’ll look first at the unedited version, followed by output from the noise reduction tools we’ve used.

You can click on each image for a large version. For easy comparison, you might want to open the full-size versions in different tabs and flip between them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My preference from the above images is in the following order, but you should come to your own conclusion:

• DxO PureRAW DeepPrime XD2
• Adobe Lightroom AI DeNoise
• Topaz Photo
• DxO PureRAW DeepPrime 3
• On1 NoNoise AI

Comparing the images, I prefer the way the subject looks using DxO PureRAW DeepPrime XD2, with slightly more feather detail and improved background noise reduction compared to DeepPRIME 3. However, Lightroom’s AI DeNoise tool puts in a strong performance, being my second favourite result.

Topaz Photo does a good job of noise reduction but the sharpening tool is a little aggressive in my opinion so I would probably dial that down from the suggested setting. On1 NoNoise AI seems to add a number of artefacts in the area around the bird which is not good.

It’s also worth noting that none of these images have any additional sharpening applied beyond the default in each tool. So you can always adjust further in a photo editor like Lightroom if required.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 2

The second image is a shot of a Merganser duck having a bath. Due to the fast motion, this was shot at a high shutter speed with a resulting ISO of 5000. This was shot on a Canon EOS R5. Again, the small version doesn’t show too much noise, but if you click through to the larger version you’ll see more noise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My preference from the above image versions is in the following order, but you should come to your own conclusion:

• Topaz Photo
• DxO PureRAW DeepPrime XD 2
• Adobe Lightroom AI DeNoise
• DxO PureRAW DeepPrime
• On1 NoNoise AI

Overall, I feel that the output from Topaz Photo is the best option, followed by  PureRAW DeepPrime XD and Lightroom AI DeNoise. I would however say that the Topaz sharpening is quite a lot, but this can be tweaked.

They are definitely all better than what I can achieve in regular Lightroom without the Lightroom Denoise AI.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 3

The third image is of a common crane preening itself. This was shot in relatively low light on a Canon EOS R5 at ISO 6400.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My preference from the above image versions is in the following order, but you should come to your own conclusion:

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD 2
• Topaz Photo
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3
• Lightroom Denoise AI
• On1 NoNoise AI

This was a very tough one to call and honestly, I felt that the results from DxO DeepPRIME XD 2 were the best, followed by Topaz Photo. DeepPRIME 3 and Lightroom are very close. On1 NoNoise AI continues to introduce odd artefacts in my tests which are not ideal.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 4

People are one of the more challenging subjects for noise reduction tools to get right. We are highly attuned to skin tones and how people’s faces look, and even slight errors can ruin an image. Let’s see how these tools do with this image, shot at Paris train station at night on a Canon EOS 6D at 6400 ISO.

This shot was taken of my wife who has a light skin tone. The tools may work differently with other skin tones, so for those who shoot a lot of portrait and people photos I’d recommend testing against a variety of skin tones.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of these images, my order of preference was as follows

• Topaz Photo
• Lightroom AI DeNoise
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2S
• DeePRIME 3
• On1 NoNoise AI

In this case I think Topaz Photo produces the most natural looking result by far. The Lightroom result is good but not quite as natural looking, although still very usable.

Honestly, I am not that impressed with any of the other results, the skin either looks unnaturally waxy (often a problem with noise reduction tools), or the sharpening is too strong.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 5

This image was also taken indoors on a Canon EOS 6D. Wedding photographers tend to find themselves shooting in low light, so including a wedding photograph for noise reduction testing seemed like a good idea.

 

 

 

 

 

Of these images, my order of preference was as follows

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2S
• Lightroom AI DeNoise
• Topaz Photo
• On1 NoNoise AI
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3

This time round, I found DxO PureRAW XD2 to produce the most natural results. Lightroom DeNoise AI also did a good job. None of the other three really produced a particular standout result.

 

Noise Reduction Test Image 6

This image was also taken on a Canon EOS 6D. Indoor low light photography is commonly a time when high ISO images are output, so I wanted to include this image which also doesn’t have people or animals in it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of these images, my order of preference was as follows

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2
• Topaz Photo
• On1 NoNoise AI
• DxO DeepPRIME 3
• Adobe Lightroom DeNoise

My favourite of these was the DeepPRIME XD2, closely followed by Topaz Photo. On1 NoNoise AI did a good job in terms of noise reduction but shifted the moon craters green, which lost it points. Adobe Lightroom DeNoise put in its worst performance with this specific image.

 

Noise Reduction Software Results Conclusion

I definitely encourage you to draw your own conclusions, both based on my testing and also using your own image files.

In terms of overall results, DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 was my favourite in the majority of images, with Topaz Photo right behind. Third was Lightroom, then DxO DeepPRIME 3 and finally On1 NoNoise.

To be honest, in terms of quality, it is a very close run between Topaz Photo and DxO PureRAW.

On1 NoNoise isn’t quite as good yet.

Lightroom does put in a great show, and gets bonus points for small file sizes and the fact it integrates well into an Adobe-centered workflow.

If you had read this guide prior to April 2023, you would have noticed me discount Lightroom’s built-in noise reduction tool as they weren’t that great. And when they announced the AI powered tool, I was a bit skeptical. After all, how could Lightroom’s first generation AI noise reduction compete with tools that are into their third generation.

It turns out I was very much under estimating Adobe. They may have taken their time with rolling out noise reduction, but I have to be honest, I was very impressed with the results of the new Lightroom noise reduction toolkit. If you are already invested in the Lightroom ecosystem, you might not need to look any further for your noise reduction.

 

Noise Reduction Speed

Image quality is the most important factor in assessing noise reduction tools, but it’s not the only one. If you are processing large numbers of images, then you will want to consider how long that process will take, and how big the resulting file sizes will be.

Let’s look at how each tool performed in terms of speed of processing. I used the same six images, and timed how long each tool took to process using a stopwatch. Of course, performance will vary depending on various factors, so rather than focusing on the actual time, I’d suggest looking at them relatively.

In every case I used the RAW file straight out of my Canon camera. The first three were shot on a Canon EOS R5, with the last one on a Canon EOS 6D.

Note that each tool works a little differently.

DxO PureRAW loads the image file without displaying a preview, so there’s no initial processing and therefore this stage takes no time at all. You just choose the processing mode and set it going. If you want to adjust the settings you can, but this is optional.

Topaz Photo loads the image and runs it through its AI powered Autopilot tool to analyse what improvements are required. Once done it generates a preview of a zoomed in area of the image with the recommended adjustments applied.

As these adjustments will vary based on the image the time can vary, but it takes 10-20 seconds on my system with GPU acceleration and a fairly high end Nvidia graphics card. In my testing it is often slower when it detects faces or text as it runs additional algorithms on these to see if they need additional processing.

You can then adjust the settings and pan around the image. Any adjustment or panning requires the preview to be generated again, which takes a second or so. Finally, you save the image, which takes more time. For my numbers, I’ve included both the time to load the preview image initially, and then the time to save it.

You can disable the Autopilot, but in my testing it works pretty well so I have left it on.

On1 NoNoise AI also analyses the whole image file on load, so it also takes longer to load. However, as most of the processing is done up front, subsequent adjustments and the saving process are a lot quicker than the other tools. Again, I’ve included the total processing time in my numbers.

For reference, I am using a desktop computer with an with an AMD Ryzen 7950X3D processor, a 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU and 64GB of system memory. Images were stored on an SSD for maximum read speed.

In the past I have done tests with a desktop computer with an AMD Ryzen 5800X processor, an 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060TI and 64GB of system memory. I’ve also tested with a laptop computer with a mobile 4070 Nvidia graphics card and an AMD processor.

The results were very similar – as far as I can tell as long as you have a relatively recent graphics card then it will perform much better than a regular CPU.

As I said, I used a stopwatch to time the results, so there will be a small margin of error. Some of the tools like Topaz also provide a time when they process, but this tends to be under the actual processing time by a few seconds in my testing, hence the use of a stopwatch for consistency across all the tools.

Finally, Lightroom does allow you to toggle use of the GPU on and off, but as far as I could tell it ignored my setting and used my GPU anyway. So I was not able to test Lightroom’s noise reduction using only the CPU, but you can assume it will be much slower.

 

Image 1, Robin on Branch

Canon EOS R5. 45-megapixel image, ISO 6400.

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 6 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2- 11 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 43 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 125 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3: 152 MB; DeepPrime XD2 133 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 13 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 24 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output 134 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 11 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 146 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output 131 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 14 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 29 MB

 

Image 2, Duck in Water

Canon EOS R5. 45-megapixel image, ISO 5000.

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 6 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 8 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 44 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 126 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3: 172 MB; DeepPrime XD2 159 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 10 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 21 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 158 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 13 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 144 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 174 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 11 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 35 MB

 

Image 3, Crane

Canon EOS R5. 45-megapixel image, ISO 6400.

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 8 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 8 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 43 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 125 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3: 164 MB; DeepPrime XD2: 148 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 11 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 32 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 148 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 13 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 145 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output 147 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 12 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 31 MB

 

Image 4, Person by train

Canon EOS 6D. 20.2 Megapixel image, ISO 6400

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 5 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 5 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 21 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 57 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3:  65 MB; DeepPrime XD2: 58 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 23 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 27 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 61 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 8 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 72 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 53 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 5 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 25 MB

 

Image 5, Person at Wedding

Canon EOS 6D. 20.2 Megapixel image, ISO 6400

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 3 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 4 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 22 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 58 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3:  75 MB; DeepPrime XD2 68 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 11 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 18 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 69 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 7 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 70 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 67 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 4 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 28 MB

 

Image 6, Indoor low Light scene

DxO PureRAW 5

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 3 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 4 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 – 21 seconds (CPU only)
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 – 57 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: DeepPRIME 3:  62 MB; DeepPrime XD2: 57 MB

 

Topaz Photo

• Topaz Photo – 11 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• Topaz Photo – 18 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 57 MB

 

On1 NoNoise AI

• On1 NoNoise AI – 8 seconds (GPU accelerated).
• On1 NoNoise AI – 71 seconds (CPU only)
• DNG file output: 56 MB

 

Lightroom AI

• Lightroom – 5 seconds (GPU accelerated)
• File size is just the original RAW, which was 24 MB

 

Average Relative Speed

Taking all the numbers, here’s how each tool performed on my computer on average.

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 GPU: 5 seconds
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 GPU: 7 seconds
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 CPU: 32 seconds
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2 CPU: 91 seconds
• Topaz Photo GPU: 14 seconds
• Topaz Photo CPU: 24 seconds
• On1 NoNoise AI GPU: 10 seconds
• On1 NoNoise AI CPU: 108 seconds
• Lightroom AI GPU: 9 seconds

And here’s a chart to show the difference. Smaller bars mean faster performance.

The headline takeaway: a good GPU makes a big difference. On my system, the spread between the four products is small with a GPU in play, from around 5 seconds for DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3 up to around 14 seconds for Topaz Photo on average.

If you are planning on batch processing a large number of images, especially higher megapixel images, then a good GPU is going to make a significant difference.

If you don’t have a good GPU, then in my testing Topaz Photo produced the fastest CPU only results, but of course this will vary depending on your CPU.

Note that these results are very hardware dependent, and software updates can make a difference too. For reference, here are my results back when I first started testing noise reduction software back in 2021 with an older computer and older versions of the software. As you can see, the GPU acceleration over the years has made a remarkable improvement!

Again, I want to make clear that these results are going to vary depending on a range of factors, from the RAW file format through to the size of the images you use and your computer specifications and hardware.

Whilst these numbers do show the relative performance of these tools on my setup, your results are very likely to vary depending on your setup. I highly recommend testing the performance on your system and using your image files with a trial version prior to making any financial commitment.

 

Average File Sizes

Another factor you might consider is the file sizes that the software outputs. One thing that surprised me was how different these were for the same input images.

DxO DeepPRIME 3 consistently produced the largest output DNG files, while the XD2 version of the noise reduction AI produced the smallest. That said, Lightroom wins this contest by a country mile because it doesn’t even need to generate a DNG file when doing noise reduction, which is definitely a big benefit.

Here’s how those looked as an average across my results. Notice the output file sizes were the same regardless of whether GPU or CPU was used, which is to be expected as the final result is the same. Also, this includes both 20.2MP and 45MP input files, so the comparison is just relative.

• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME 3: 115 MB
• DxO PureRAW DeepPRIME XD2: 103 MB
• Topaz Photo: 105 MB
• On1 NoNoise AI: 105 MB
• Lightroom AI: 29 MB

And here’s a chart to show the difference. Smaller bars mean smaller file sizes.

I’m not suggesting you base your decision on which tool produces the smallest file sizes, as hard drive space is relatively cheap. However, if it’s a close decision between two tools, this might be a decider.

 

Which Noise Reduction Software is Best?

If I was buying today as a pure noise reduction tool, looking for the best results on high-ISO wildlife and low-light files, I’d choose DxO PureRAW 6. DeepPRIME XD3 produces the cleanest detail in most of my tests, the workflow is set-and-forget, the licence is perpetual, and $139.99 is a fair price for what you get.

Adobe’s Lightroom Classic 15.3 Denoise AI puts in a strong performance. With background batch processing finally added in April 2026 and quality that holds up across most images, Lightroom subscribers don’t really need a separate denoise tool unless they’re regularly fighting the very highest-ISO files. The integration is as clean as it can be (it’s part of Lightroom already), and the output file sizes are tiny compared to the standalone tools (which all generate large DNGs).

Topaz Photo is worth considering if you want the additional tools it bundles in (upscaling, face recovery, advanced sharpening). However, it’s substantially more expensive and now requires a subscription, which makes the value proposition harder than it used to be.

On1 NoNoise AI is the cheapest of the four at $69.99 perpetual and offers the snappiest interface in everyday use. The noise reduction quality is a step behind the other three on the toughest files, and the product line has been on the 2024 version since August 2024, so updates have been thin. Worth considering if budget is the hard constraint.

If you’d prefer a more detailed comparison, here are head-to-heads of the closer match-ups.

 

Topaz Photo vs DxO PureRAW

• DxO PureRAW produces great results, especially with the DeepPRIME XD3 model. PureRAW is RAW-input only, and you get a more focused toolset than Topaz Photo. In my tests, the DxO noise reduction was my favourite result in most of the six images, sometimes only by a small margin.
• Speed-wise, DxO PureRAW is faster on my hardware. It does need a good GPU to get that speed.
• Both tools offer batch processing and excellent lens correction and sharpening across a huge range of camera and lens combinations.
• Topaz Photo generally produces similar results to PureRAW, depending on the options you choose. The Autopilot sharpening can be a little on the aggressive side, which is easy to dial back.
• Both options give you a preview of the output so you can adjust settings before processing. The trade-off is that more options means more time per image when you want to fine-tune.
• Cost-wise, Topaz Photo is significantly more expensive. Since September 2025 it’s been subscription-only, with Personal at $199/year, Pro at $599/year, and Studio at $399/year. DxO PureRAW 6 is a one-off $139.99 (or $89.99 to upgrade from v4 or v5). Topaz bundles more (upscale, face recovery, advanced sharpening), whether that’s worth the recurring cost depends on how much you need those tools.
• Both tools integrate with Lightroom. The DxO integration is the smoother of the two for batch processing in my experience, while Topaz is a touch more flexible for one-off images thanks to the Autopilot pre-analysis.

Honestly, in terms of actual denoising, you’ll only notice the minor differences between these two if you dive in at the pixel level on high-ISO files.

 

Topaz Photo vs Lightroom Denoise

This is the comparison that’s shifted most over the past year, so it’s worth covering directly.

Up to Lightroom Classic 14.4, the answer was clear: Topaz won on most fronts because Lightroom couldn’t batch-denoise, couldn’t run in the background, and offered less granular control. If you needed to denoise more than a handful of images at once, Topaz was the answer.

Lightroom Classic 15.3 (April 2026) closes most of that gap. Background processing means Denoise no longer locks up Lightroom while it runs, and you can now apply Denoise via Copy/Paste, Sync, Auto-Sync, or presets across a whole shoot in the background. The “no batch denoise” critique no longer applies.

Where Topaz still wins: image quality on the very highest-ISO files, the breadth of bundled AI tools (upscale, face recovery, healing brush), the live preview before you commit, and JPG and TIFF input support (Lightroom Denoise is RAW-only).

Where Lightroom wins for most photographers: it’s already in your workflow if you subscribe to the Photography Plan, the output is non-destructive (no separate DNG file unless you choose), file sizes are tiny because the denoise is stored in a sidecar rather than as a new image, and you don’t pay extra for the feature. For most Photography Plan subscribers, the gap between Lightroom Denoise and Topaz Photo is no longer wide enough to justify the additional subscription, unless you specifically need the bundled non-denoise tools.

If you’re not already a Lightroom subscriber and you want a denoise-plus-extras app, Topaz Photo is still the more capable tool. If you are a subscriber, Lightroom is likely enough.

 

Personal workflow. I use both Topaz Photo and DxO PureRAW. I keep Topaz Photo because I’m grandfathered onto the older annual price rather than the current subscription tiers; if I was starting fresh today I’d think harder before paying $199/year for the Personal tier, given how good Lightroom Denoise has become.

For editing a single image, I usually reach for DxO because the Lightroom plugin works cleanly and PureRAW 6 runs in 5-7 seconds per image on my hardware. For batch noise reduction across a wildlife shoot, DxO is again my default for the same reasons. Topaz Photo comes out when I want the bundled tools (rescaling, face adjustments, advanced sharpening) on the same image. Most of my run-of-the-mill editing now uses Lightroom Denoise directly, since v15.3’s background batch makes it practical for everyday work.

If I wasn’t already invested in Lightroom, I’d likely look at DxO PhotoLab as a full-featured editor with the same excellent denoise built in.

 

DxO PureRAW vs Topaz Photo vs Lightroom Summary

Choose Lightroom if:

• You already use Lightroom or are considering using it for your photo editing workflow
• You aren’t that bothered about granular control or batch processing noise reduction.

 

Choose DxO PureRAW if:

• You want a simple click and go option for noise reduction that works standalone or through Lightroom
• You want some of the best-in-class noise reduction
• It supports your camera and lens combination
• You want to be able to reduce noise on multiple images at once
• You have a supported GPU (download the trial and test it out before purchase)
• You prefer to pay once and actually own the software you buy

 

Choose Topaz Photo if:

• You want more control over the noise reduction process, and don’t mind spending time doing so
• You want to be able to reduce noise on more than just RAW files
• It supports your camera and lens combination
• You want to be able to do more than just noise reduction with the tool

To reiterate, all of these pieces of software work very well at the job they are designed to do, so it mostly comes down to your workflow and approach to editing.

Here are links to each noise reduction application on test so you can download them and try them out yourself with your own images. Again, I highly recommend you test each version against the types of images you usually take, so you can see how it runs on your hardware and also choose your favourite.

• DxO PureRAW
• Topaz Photo
• On1 NoNoise AI
• Adobe Lightroom Classic CC

 

A Word of Warning about AI tools and Photo Contests

I just wanted to briefly cover noise reduction software and photography competitions. As these tools get more powerful, some competitions have placed restrictions on which AI processes are acceptable, and the rules have shifted a fair amount over the past few years.

For some historical context, the 2021 Audubon Photography Society awards had a rule forbidding “AI and machine-learning-based software used for upscaling, sharpening and significant noise reduction”. That rule has since been removed from their ruleset, which signals a softening attitude as the technology has matured.

Most of the major contests landed in roughly the same place by 2026: AI-driven noise reduction is acceptable, AI-generated content (and AI content additions like Photoshop’s Generative Fill) is not. The detail varies between contests.

World Press Photo bans generative AI tools across all categories. AI-powered noise reduction is permitted “with restraint”, and RAW files have to be submitted as part of the entry.

Wildlife Photographer of the Year (run by the Natural History Museum) explicitly permits noise reduction, including AI-driven noise reduction, as long as no new visual content is introduced. AI-generated images and AI content additions are banned.

Sony World Photography Awards bans AI-generated and AI-manipulated images outright after the 2023 Eldagsen episode. Their wording goes further than the others, prohibiting “excessive photo manipulation or use of artificial intelligence”, with “excessive” left to jury judgement. If you’re entering Sony’s contest with a heavily denoised high-ISO file, treat that as a grey area worth checking before submission.

If you plan to enter a competition, read the current rules for that specific competition before submitting. If a contest doesn’t allow AI denoise but does allow traditional noise reduction, Lightroom’s older sliders (or any of the other tools’ non-AI modes) are a safer bet than the AI-powered options.

 

Further Reading

That’s it for my comparison of some of the more popular noise reduction applications on the market today. If you found this useful, you might enjoy some of my other photography content. Here are some articles to get you started.

• I have a guide to my favourite photo editing applications, as well as the best alternatives to Lightroom
• If you’re wondering how to sort your photos, see my guide to how to organize and find your digital photos
• We have a guide to how to use a compact camera, how to use a DSLR camera, and how to use a mirrorless camera. We also have a guide to how a DSLR works
• Knowing how to compose a great photo is a key photography skill. See our guide to composition in photography for lots of tips on this subject
• We have a guide to what depth of field is and when you would want to use it.
• We are big fans of getting the most out of your digital photo files, and do to that you will need to shoot in RAW. See our guide to RAW in photography to understand what RAW is, and why you should switch to RAW as soon as you can if your camera supports it.
• You’re going to need something to run your photo editing software on. See our guide to the best laptops for photo editing for some tips on what to look for.
• If you’re looking for more advice on specific tips for different scenarios, we also have you covered. See our guide to Northern Lights photography, long exposure photography, fireworks photography, tips for taking photos of stars, and cold weather photography.
• Colour accuracy is important for photography – see our guide to monitor calibration to ensure your screen is set up correctly.
• If you’re looking for a great gift for a photography loving friend or family member (or yourself!), take a look at our photography gift guide,
• If you’re in the market for a new camera, we have a detailed guide to the best travel cameras, as well as specific guides for the best cameras for hiking and backpacking, the best compact camera, best bridge camera, best mirrorless camera and best DSLR camera. We also have a guide to the best camera lenses.
• If you want a camera or lens, but the prices are a bit high, see our guide to where to buy used cameras and camera gear for some budget savings options.
• We have a guide to why you need a tripod, a guide to choosing a travel tripod, and a round-up of our favourite travel tripods

 

Looking to Improve Your Photography?

If you found this post helpful, and you want to improve your photography overall, you might want to check out my online travel photography course.

Since launching the course in 2016, I’ve already helped over 2,000 students learn how to take better photos. The course covers pretty much everything you need to know, from the basics of how a camera works, through to composition, light, and photo editing.

It also covers more advanced topics, including astrophotography, long exposure photography, flash photography, and HDR photography.

You get feedback from me as you progress, access to webinars, interviews and videos, as well as exclusive membership of a Facebook group where you can get feedback on your work and take part in regular challenges.

It’s available for an amazing one-off price for lifetime access, and I think you should check it out. Which you can do by clicking here.

And that’s it! I’d love to hear about your favourite noise reduction tools, and am happy to answer any questions you have. Just pop them in the comments below and I’ll get back to you as soon as I can.