Canon EOS R5 Review (2026): Is It Still Worth Buying?

I bought my Canon EOS R5 in March 2021 to replace one of my ageing Canon 6D bodies, and it’s been my primary camera ever since. For five years it’s been my main camera body, including across multiple safaris in East Africa and landscape sessions across the UK, Europe and the USA. I’ve yet to find a situation where this camera let me down.

That’s not a statement I make lightly. I’ve been shooting professionally since 2010, and I’ve used cameras from Canon, Sony, Panasonic and Nikon over the years. I also teach an online travel photography course, so helping other photographers decide what gear is right for them is part of my day job. The R5 is the camera that made me stop thinking about gear and just focus on getting the shot.

Now, in 2026, Canon has officially discontinued the original R5 in favour of the R5 Mark II. That means the original R5 is available at significant discounts, with new bodies now heavily discounted and used copies cheaper still. The question I keep getting asked is: should you buy the original R5 now, or spend more on the Mark II?

In this review, I’m going to share my experience using the R5 for travel and wildlife photography over the past five years. It’s also the body at the heart of my bird photography camera and lens guide. I’ll cover what I love, what could be better, and whether the original R5 is still worth buying now that it’s been discontinued. I’ll also compare it to the R5 Mark II so you can decide which makes more sense for your needs and budget.

Some background before we get into the details. I’m a full time professional travel photographer, and I’ve been a Canon user for most of my career. My first SLR was a Canon AE-1, and since then I’ve worked my way through several Canon bodies. Before the R5, my workhorses were a pair of Canon 6Ds, which offered a great balance of image quality, weight, and reliability for travel photography. Whatever body you carry, the challenges of shooting while travelling stay much the same.

I’m not blindly loyal to Canon, though. We also have a Panasonic micro four thirds camera, a Sony RX100 compact camera, and I’ve used some of the Sony a6xxx series as well. My wife Jess has also had a Nikon DSLR. I recommend what works, regardless of brand.

These offered everything I needed from a travel camera – good performance in a range of light conditions, a relatively low weight (for a DSLR anyway!), and an easy to use interface. It’s also worth mentioning that I think Canon users have access to some of the best lenses on the market.

Since I first bought my R5 Canon has expanded the EOS R lineup significantly. The R6 Mark II replaced the original R6, and the R6 Mark III (32.5MP, 40fps, 7K video) has since become Canon’s current mid-range full-frame body. In 2024, Canon released the R5 Mark II, which is the direct successor to the camera I’m reviewing here.

In early 2026, Canon officially discontinued the original R5, making the Mark II the current production model. I’ll cover the differences between these cameras later in this guide, including whether the original R5 still makes sense as a purchase now.

This review is going to be purely from my perspective as a travel photographer, using the camera for still photography. Whilst this camera is reportedly fantastic for video, I don’t do much video work, so this Canon EOS R5 review won’t be covering the video-only features in any depth.

First up, a quick overview of the key features of this camera.

EOS R5 Key Features & Overview

The Canon EOS R5 is a mirrorless full frame camera. If you want to know what that means, see my guide to using a mirrorless camera which covers the concepts of a mirrorless camera, and what sets it apart from other cameras on the market.

The main features of this camera are:

• 45MP full frame sensor
• In-body sensor shift image stabilisation providing up to 8 stops of stabilisation
• Dual-pixel autofocus system capable of eye-tracking on people and animals
• 3.2″ touchscreen and electronic viewfinder
• RF lens mount (compatible with EF & EF-S lenses with adaptor)
• 12 fps (mechanical shutter), 20fps (electronic shutter) – requires compatible lens
• Weighs: 738g / 26oz with battery
• Dimensions: 138 x 98 x 88 mm (5.43 x 3.84 x 3.46″)
• Weight: 738g (26oz) with card and battery
• 8K video support
• Two card slots (Standard SD + CFExpress)
• 2.4Ghz & 5Ghz WiFi + Bluetooth support
• Weather sealed
• Flash hotshoe (no built-in flash)
• Mic in/line in / headphone socket, HDMI micro out, flash sync socket, N3-type remote control terminal USB-C port.

You can see full specifications on the Canon website here.

 

What’s in the EOS R5 Box?

The EOS R5 box has the following:

• The EOS R5 camera body
• Camera Cover R-F-5
• An LP-E6NH battery with battery cover
• A Canon battery charger (with cable, in the UK)
• A USB-C to USB-C cable
• An EOS R5 branded camera strap
• A cable protector
• A getting started guide (the full manual is online)

As is typical for a camera of this level, the camera body does not come with any lenses included. So if you wish to add lenses, you will need to budget for and buy those separately.

It is mostly what you would expect, although there were two disappointments for me of accessories that were not included that I think would be useful for a lot of shooters.

First, although the EOS R5 supports USB-C charging via a PD compatible charger, Canon doesn’t supply a compatible charger in the box. However, you can charge the LP-E6NH battery in the camera with any USB-C PD charger that supplies 9V/3A (27W or more). Canon’s own PD-E1 adaptor did this job, but it has now been discontinued.

I’d also really have appreciated an EF-RF adaptor in the box. I feel that most users coming to this camera system will likely have existing lenses, or might consider buying some EF lenses, so having that in the box would have been nice. As it is, you can pick one up here.

 

What Do I Use My Canon EOS R5 For?

Let me qualify what I use my camera for, since we all have different needs from our equipment.

I’m primarily a travel photographer, which means I shoot a wide range of subjects on our travels. These include landscapes, as well as city scenes, streets, people, events, buildings, wildlife, and food. I also often shoot indoors (e.g., museums, hotels, places of worship) where a tripod may not be allowed.

So I need a camera that is capable in a wide range of scenarios. It needs to be able to stand up to the elements for outdoor shoots, and to be reasonably portable as I’m going to be travelling with it and carrying it around all day. That weight factor was one of the main reasons I had originally chose the Canon 6D over the Canon 5D series many years ago.

 

 

 

Things I Love About the Canon EOS R5

Rather than dive into every aspect of this camera, I’m going to talk about the things I love and the things that I think could be improved with this camera, based on my experience with it to date.

I purchased the camera in March 2021, and have used it on trips across the UK, USA and a number of East African countries.

Autofocus System

The autofocus system was one of the main reasons I chose to upgrade to the new Canon EOS R5 from the 6D. For daytime landscape photography this wasn’t a big deal of course as there’s not a lot of subject movement to worry about, and I’m usually shooting at a fairly wide depth of field in good light.

That story changes when I’m shooting people, fast moving wildlife, or in very low light situations. In those situations, particularly the action shots, the 6D was definitely limiting some of my shots, and I wasn’t nailing focus as reliably as I wanted to.

This was especially the case when shooting wide open at f/1.8 or f/2.8, meaning I’d often use narrower apertures to achieve a deeper depth of field. This would help ensure I’d nail focus on the subject’s eye rather than the tip of their nose, but sort of missed the point of having a wide aperture lens. Tracking moving subjects was also quite a challenge at times.

These issues are no longer a problem thanks to the quite frankly astonishing autofocus system that Canon has put into the Canon EOS R5.

There are a range of autofocus options on the R5. The most impressive is the subject detection autofocus, which can automatically identify and lock onto people, animals and vehicles. It will do this in as little as 0.05 seconds. For people and animals, the system will lock onto their eyes if it can find them, otherwise it will lock onto a head or body.

It’s hard to explain how great this system is, because it literally feels like magic, even on EF lenses. I appreciate describing something as magic in a review might not be subjectively helpful, but I challenge you to use it and not come away smiling at your newfound focus powers.

Even more impressively, you get focus across pretty much the whole viewfinder. My 6D had a sad little clump of 11 autofocus points clustered around the centre of the viewfinder. Of course, I could switch to live view and wait a few seconds for the camera to focus, but that was never really practical in situations regarding a moving subject.

The R5 is a big improvement in autofocus points.

As a reminder, the 6D has 11 focus points. The 5D Mark IV has 61 focus points.  The R5 somewhat ups the ante, with 5,940 focus points! That’s a lot of focus choice.

There are of course a range of other focus options, so you don’t have to rely on the subject detection autofocus system. You can also set up different buttons to trigger different autofocus methods, so you can have one button to lock onto eyes for example, and another for centre point focusing.

Whichever focus system you use, the R5 will lock focus across most of the viewfinder at superhuman speed, and it even supports focusing with lenses that have a maximum aperture up to f/22. For comparison, the 6D autofocus system wouldn’t focus on a lens with a maximum aperture larger than f/5.6. Even the lauded 5D Mark IV tapped out at lenses up to f/8.

I appreciate there are not many lenses with a maximum aperture of f/22, but it shows how much of a leap forward this new autofocus system is.

In terms of available light required to focus, the R5 can focus in light levels of -6EV. That means you can attain focus even in a landscape at night lit solely by half a moon, or when using high strength neutral density filters. By comparison, the 6D I was shooting with had a low light focus capability of -3EV, which was considered impressive at the time. That’s roughly the light available at night under a full moon, and the same as the 5D Mark IV which also focused down to -3EV.

The Canon EOS R6 has marginally better low-light focus performance, down to -6.5EV.

Basically, if you like astrophotography, low light photography, or shooting with a neutral density filter, the R5 (and R6) autofocus system is going to work great for you.

 

I’ve tried this autofocus system on a range of subjects, and it is really amazing how well it works to lock and hold focus on even a fast-moving subject or relatively distant subjects. With multiple subjects in the viewfinder, you can toggle between them using the joystick.

Having essentially given up on anything other than centre-point focus on my 6D, using the “focus and recompose” technique for most of my shots, having an autofocus system that identifies and tracks subjects effectively is a revelation.

It is worth mentioning that whilst I have raved about the subject detection autofocus system on the R5, it is not infallible. This is particularly the case when shooting subjects that the camera isn’t that familiar with.

For example, shooting wildlife in East Africa, it did occasionally decide that the blade of grass in front of the rhino was the subject rather than the rhino. Or that the leopard’s spots were the eye, rather than the actual eye.

These were edge cases rather than the normal, but it does stress the importance of not relying on any automated system too much. For fast moving birds in flight, in my experience it locked onto an eye if visible 95% of the time. For animals, it was more like 80-90% reliable, depending on the animal.

Of course, you can also assign and move the focus point manually with the joystick, or use the touchscreen to select a subject to track. Personally I’ve assigned the DOF button on the front of the camera to a centre focus point. This gives me the best of both worlds, as I use back button focusing for subject / eye tracking, and the DOF button for centre point focusing.

When you’re looking through the viewfinder, you can set up the camera so you can use your right thumb on the touchscreen to move the focus point. So if the camera selects the wrong subject, you can easily override it. This is similar to a system I used in the Panasonic GX8 which I thought was very clever, and I’m thrilled it’s made it into the EOS R5 as it is so intuitive to use.

Another option is to set up the subject detection system (in Servo AF mode) so it has an initial focus point (which you can move). This means the camera will still search for a subject’s face, eyes or torso, but will start the search in an area you define.

This is a good option if a scene has multiple subjects and you quickly want to select one, or if the camera seems to be struggling to tell the difference between a blade of grass and a rhino. You can see how to do that in the manual here.

I’m not saying that the focus system is the only reason to upgrade to this camera, but it may be enough for some. Let’s look at some other features I’ve enjoyed.

 

Image Stabilisation

The R5, and its sibling the Canon R6, were Canon’s first cameras to be released with a built in in-body image stabilisation (IBIS) system. For years, Canon has pushed the message that in-body image stabilisation wasn’t really required, because lens based stabilisation was good enough.

It turns out though that with pretty much every other manufacturer out there releasing cameras with in-body image stabilisation, Canon couldn’t ignore the trend any more.

Not wanting to do things by halves, the system that Canon developed for IBIS is spectacular. It offers up to 8 stops of stabilisation when combined with a supported lens. In theory, that means that if you can hand-hold your lens at 1/250th of a second, you should be able to get the same sharp results at 1 second!

To compare with other full frame flagships on the market at the time the camera was released, Sony’s a9 II camera offers 5.5 stops of compensation, their A7 III offers 5 stops, and Nikon’s Z6 II offers 5 stops.

Of course, there are a lot of variables to consider, not least of which is that you only get the full 8 stops of stabilisation on the R5 with specific RF lenses.

However, the IBIS system works with both stabilised and non-stabilised EF  lenses. For EF lenses that already have built in image stabilisation, there is some improvement but it is not huge. The camera does some work to further stabilise the image, but there are not huge leaps in performance.

However, if you have non-stabilised EF lenses, then the camera IBIS system can provide 2 to 4 stops of image stabilisation, which is definitely a bonus.

I have three IS EF lenses (16-35 f/4, 70-200 /f.28 II and 100-400 IS II), and my testing has shown that the in-body image stabilisation doesn’t make much difference as the lens stabilisation in EF lenses is already pretty good at around 4 stops.

However, for my other Canon EF lenses which aren’t stabilised, including a 100mm f/2.8 macro and 85mm f/1.8 portrait lens, it’s fantastic to be able to shoot these at lower shutter speeds if necessary.

Definitely do not discount your EF lenses, as the R5 is capable of breathing new life into them. I’ve found I can hand hold non-stabilised EF lenses up to four stops slower than usual with the IBIS system enabled. You are also future proofed when and if you choose to buy RF glass.

 

Burst Speed

The Canon 6D I am used to using has a maximum burst speed of a fairly lacklustre 4.4 frames per second. That means that when you press and hold the shutter button, the camera will take around four images every second.

That might sound like a lot, but in action photography a second is a long time, and a slow burst speed can mean that you miss shots.

The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a burst rate of 7.7 fps, which is fairly respectable.

The EOS R5 has a rather more impressive burst speed than my 6D and even the 5D Mark IV. It can do up to 12 frames per second with the mechanical shutter, and 20 frames per second with the electronic shutter.

The latter is particularly spooky because it’s totally silent. So you point the camera at something, hold down the button, and your memory card starts to fill up very quickly.

Of course, there are some caveats to these burst speeds. For the mechanical shutter, you need to be using a supported lens (full list here) and the LP-E6NH battery with over 60% charge. Most EF lenses from 2012 onwards should work, I’ve had no problems with my 70-200 IS II f/2.8L & 100-400 IS II for example.

If you use older batteries, batteries with a lower charge, unsupported lenses, or have features like WiFi enabled, the mechanical burst speed will be slower. The camera makes this clear to you via different coloured icons. A green “H+” on the view screen means you’re going to get the 12fps. This icon changes to white and loses the “+” if higher speeds are not possible.

The electronic shutter will nearly always shoot at 20fps, although this can cause some issues with fast moving subjects, so you will want to be selective about when you choose to use it.

 

 

Fv Mode

DSLR and mirrorless cameras come with a range of modes, which span from the fully automatic “Auto” mode where the camera does everything for you, through to the “Manual” mode where you have to set aperture, shutter speed, and ISO yourself to get the correct exposure.

In between these modes there are some other partially automatic modes. For many years, these have been the same across most cameras. There’s an aperture priority mode, where you set the aperture and the camera will set the shutter speed and ISO. There’s a shutter priority mode, where you set the shutter and the camera will set the aperture and ISO.

Personally, I have always done most of my shooting in either aperture priority or full manual mode. Aperture priority means I can set the aperture to control depth of field, which is a key compositional tool for the photography I like to do. If I’m doing fast action photography, I’ll usually either shoot in shutter priority or manual.

The EOS R5 has a mode that was new to me, known as “Fv”, or Flexible value mode. This was first introduced with the EOS R mirrorless camera, and is also on the R5 and R6.

Fv mode attempts to give the photographer the best of all worlds. Basically, you can let the camera be in fully auto and select aperture, shutter speed, and ISO values for you, or you can pick and choose which of those three you want to adjust. You can also use exposure compensation in this mode.

This mode is really useful, and with some practice is rapidly becoming my go-to option. It means I can essentially shoot with the camera in the equivalent of Aperture priority mode, but with the ability to override the shutter speed and ISO settings on a per shot basis if I want to, without having to change to manual.

With the extra control ring that is available on RF lenses, which can be assigned to change shutter speed for example, I can quickly adjust shutter speed and aperture, or let the camera decide. It’s a really flexible mode, which I guess is where the name came from!

 

Lens Compatibility

For most professional photographers, the cost of their lens collection is usually higher than the cost of their camera bodies. Changing brands means investing in a new set of lenses, and this was one of the main reasons I have stuck with Canon for so long.

Whilst many of my peers were jumping ship and moving to brands like Sony, I continued to hold out hope that someday Canon would release a mirrorless system that would let me continue to use my existing lenses which I have grown to love, whilst also providing sufficient upgrades to make the investment worth it.

The Canon EOS R5 does use a new mount, first introduced on the Canon EOS R, the RF mount. The lens mount is what the lens attaches to on the camera, and as well as being a mechanical attachment, it’s also where the electronic communication between the lens and body happens.

So you can’t just take an EF or EF-S lens and attach it directly to an RF mount camera like the R5. You need a lens adaptor, specifically this RF mount adaptor.

Traditionally, lens adaptors have a bit of a negative reputation. This is usually because they are most commonly used to adapt lenses from one camera system onto another camera system, say from a Canon camera to a Sony camera. This usually has the downside that the lens ends up performing more slowly due to the electronics interface needing to translate from one brand to another.

In addition, if there’s glass inside the lens adaptor, this can reduce the image quality. As such, many photographers are wary of using any form of adaptor.

I can confirm that the Canon EF-EOS R mount adaptor does not have these issues. It is really just an electronics passthrough for the EF to RF lens mount, and it is otherwise just empty air which moves the EF lenses further away from the sensor to emulate the space the mirror in a DSLR takes up.

Performance of my EF lenses on my R5 has been stellar. In fact, I’d say it’s even better than on 6D, because you get the benefits of that lightning fast autofocus system and in-body image stabilisation.

Naturally, all Canon’s EF and even EF-S lenses are supported. Note that the EF-S lenses will produce cropped images as if they were on an APS-C sensor. This means you have access to a massive library of lenses as you can use the EF lenses with the help of the adaptor as well as the RF lenses.

In addition, third party lenses from the likes of Sigma and Tamron which are designed for the EF or EF-S mount will also work. I’ve not tried these as I don’t have any third-party lenses, but I have heard from other photographers using them on the R5 and R6 with no issues.

Generally, if you are worried about your EF lenses not working properly with the R5 and mount, do not be as they all seem to work fine.

 

Moving Touch Screen

Canon’s high-end cameras have, for a long time, not had a screen that moves. The main reason given for this has been that it is harder to weather seal a screen that flips out.

So the 6D and the 5D Mark IV both have a static rear screen. As they are primarily designed to be used with the viewfinder, this has not been a huge omission.

However, with a mirrorless camera, the experience is the same between the viewfinder and the rear-screen in terms of what you see. Both are electronic displays. As such, Canon has finally implemented a screen that flips out, which massively adds to the usability of the rear-view screen. It’s also fully touch-enabled, which makes flipping through menus a breeze (although you can keep using buttons if you prefer).

A flip out screen that rotates is wonderful for many reasons. For low-angle shots, you can flip the screen out and look down at it without having to contort your body to see what you’re doing.

In crowds, you can hold the camera over your head and flip the screen so it’s pointing down as you.

When you’re shooting on a tripod that isn’t quite high enough, like many travel tripods, you can flip the screen out and look down at it instead of bending over and breaking your back.

The touchscreen also adds some really useful features. As well as the aforementioned option to pick a focus point when looking through the viewfinder by dragging your thumb around the screen, you can just touch a point on the screen in normal mode to pick a focus point.

A moving touch screen is perhaps not enough of a reason to upgrade to this camera from something like the 6D, but it is definitely a very nice feature to have.

 

Electronic Viewfinder

Coming from a DSLR, one of the biggest changes is the move from an optical viewfinder to an electronic viewfinder. The lack of a mirror in a mirrorless camera means that instead of being able to look directly out of the lens as you can in a DSLR, you have to look at what the sensor is seeing.

The R5 isn’t my first experience with an electronic viewfinder. I’ve used them on a variety of cameras, from a Sony NEX 6 through to mirrorless cameras from Panasonic and others.

In my experience to date, electronic viewfinders can be very hit and miss. Whilst it’s nice to get real-time feedback on what your image is going to look like, the resolution and image quality can be lacking.

I’m pleased to report this is not the case with the R5. The electronic viewfinder is big and bright thanks to the OLED tech powering it, and the 5.76 million dots mean that you see all the detail you need to see.

You also get a choice between a 60Hz refresh rate and a 120Hz refresh rate. The latter gives smoother results when you are panning, which is very useful for wildlife photography or fast action, but comes at the cost of much reduced battery life.

I also love how I can choose to overlay information on the electronic viewfinder such as a live histogram or electronic level, as well as camera settings. You can configure what displays on the viewfinder, and even save presets you can toggle between for different scenarios, from nothing at all, to more information than you would ever need.

The electronic viewfinder only comes on when you hold your eye up to it, in order to save battery life. The electronic viewfinder uses more battery life than the rear screen, something I’ll cover later in this review.

 

Battery Compatibility

As noted above, battery life on the R5 isn’t exactly spectacular. However, this is offset by the fact that it is compatible with older Canon batteries. So whilst the Canon comes with a higher power LP-E6NH battery, it will still work with older LP-E6N and even LP-E6 batteries.

I’ve built up a collection of these batteries over the years, and it’s nice that I can still use them in a pinch. Given the retail price of the LP-E6NH batteries, this also saves me quite a bit, because you need spare batteries with this camera to get through a day of shooting.

There are some disadvantages to using these older batteries though. First, and most importantly, is that you might not get the absolute fastest burst shooting performance from them. So if you are shooting in a situation where you need those fast burst rates, be sure to use a fully charged LP-E6NH battery.

Secondly, the older batteries are slightly lower capacity than the LP-E6NH battery, so they won’t last as long. But if like me you have a collection of them that you don’t mind carrying with you, at least you’ll have some fall back options.

Personally, I have gotten through three batteries in a single day of primarily wildlife shooting, but that’s using the camera quite intensively and taking over 1,000 images as well as a lot of screen use watching wildlife. For landscape photography, the battery does last somewhat longer.

 

Built in Tools

On my Canon 6D, I ran a custom third party firmware called Magic Lantern. This added a number of features, notably for me an intervalometer and a bulb timer. This saved me from having to use an external bit of hardware for these features, which was one less thing to carry around.

Thankfully, Canon has realised that things like a built-in intervalometer and a bulb timer should just be features that a camera’s software has included, and these are included in the R5. It also has support for focus stacking and HDR images (including the option to save the original files).

You can also shoot timelapse videos, either with the built-in intervalometer or with a tool that creates the video for you from the still frames. This lets you easily create up to 8K timelapse videos with minimal fuss, and works very well in my limited testing.

Another fun feature which makes the 8K video useful even for someone like me who doesn’t really do video is that you can frame grab high resolution (35.4MP) JPEG frames from 8K video clips. This can be a handy way to get a shot that you might otherwise have missed, or as an alternative to the intervalometer for certain situations.

Whilst these are things that might not be hugely important individually, they add to the value of the camera.

 

Sensor Cover

One of the issues with a mirrorless camera system compared to a DSLR system is that the lack of a mirror in front of the sensor makes it a lot more susceptible to dust. Every time you change the lens on a camera, there is a risk of small dust particles entering the camera and settling on the sensor.

This introduces flaws into images, and whilst these can usually be easily removed in software, it’s best to try and avoid them in the first place.

Canon’s solution is to have a little cover that flips down over the sensor when the camera is powered off, which you can enable or disable in the menu options. This helps stop dust getting on the sensor, and is one of those really obvious solutions that makes you wonder why other brands haven’t done the same.

One thing to be aware of if you are coming from a DSLR is that you need to get used to putting your lens cap on the lens when not in use. On a DSLR, the light from the lens is bounced out through the viewfinder. On a mirrorless camera, the light is always hitting the sensor or, in the case of the R5, the sensor cover. This is quite a delicate bit of kit, and direct sunlight focused through a powerful lens can damage it over time.

So putting your lens cap on is definitely a habit to get back into if, like me, you’d fallen out of it.

 

CRAW Format

One of my concerns with moving to a higher pixel count camera was the additional file storage requirements of these larger files. The 20MP sensor on my 6D produced RAW image files of around 20MB – 25MB.

The 45MP sensor on the R5 captures RAW files that are around 45MB -50MB in size. Over time this definitely adds up, and whilst storage is cheap, that doesn’t mean I want to keep buying hard drives and paying extra for cloud storage.

Canon’s solution is a new compressed RAW format, known as CRAW. This still offers the 45MP resolution, but it compresses the image files. This is a lossy compression, so in theory some image quality is lost. The resulting files are around 22MB – 30MB.

In my testing, I can tell no difference at all between the normal RAW files and the CRAW files. This is the same experience reported in more thorough tests others have done on CRAW files. So I have had no hesitation in adopting this lower file size format.

Of course, I’d recommend that you do your own comparison tests for your own usage scenarios before adopting the format wholly.

 

Customization

The EOS R5 is a hugely versatile camera which works well in a range of scenarios, from landscape photography through to event, portrait, action, and wildlife photography. It’s also an incredibly capable video camera.

All these different use cases mean that the camera appeals to a wide range of photographers, all of whom have their own preferences for how a camera is set up.

Canon has long recognised that photographers have different needs, and their cameras have excellent customisation options as a result.

To start with, nearly every button on the R5 can have its function changed. So you can set up a button to trigger eye focus tracking, and one for centre point focus. You can switch dial directions for dialling in settings like aperture, ISO, and shutter speed, and you can change which dials change which setting.

If you don’t use video often, you can change the video record button to something more useful (in my case, toggling between servo AF and one-shot AF). I have my DOF button set up for centre point focus, so I can have the camera in eye tracking mode but override that for specific situations.

Beyond the buttons, you can also customise a whole range of other features. For example, you can enable or disable focus modes and even camera modes. If you never use Auto for example, you can remove that from the mode dial so you don’t have to keep skipping past it. You can also set up custom menus in the menu system for fast access to key features.

Finally, there are three custom shooting modes on the mode dial, and you can even set up each of these so the buttons in each custom mode do something different. The potential for customisation is huge.

It does take a bit of time to come up with a setup that works for you, and it might take a bit of tweaking before you land on a final configuration, but it is wonderful to have the choice to set the camera up in a way that works for you.

 

Image Quality

Obviously I can’t wrap up my thoughts on the great things about the R5 without mentioning image quality. I find the image quality, dynamic range, and ISO performance on this camera to be fantastic. However, at this price point that should be a given rather than a positive.

I feel that camera technology has reached the point that pretty much every high-end full frame camera is going to produce fantastic images. If you want to pixel peep and quibble over a stop of dynamic range here or there, there are some great resources for that level of detail.

For me, the main thing is that the camera produces fantastic images in a range of conditions, that the noise performance at high ISO is good thanks to the dual gain sensor, and that the files it produces have room for lots of manoeuvrability in post-processing. The R5 delivers fully on all those counts based on my experience.

It is a camera I can rely on to do the job of capturing the images I want.

 

Cons of the EOS R5

Coming from the EOS 6D, a camera which was released in 2012, you might think I would find little to fault with a camera that was released eight years later. In general you would be right, but there are definitely a few things I have found aren’t that great about the R5. Here they are.

No built-in GPS

This is definitely a feature that I appreciate is a bit niche. However, as a travel photographer, having my photos GPS tagged is something I personally find incredibly useful, and having a built-in GPS that tagged my photos with location information is something I used every day on my 6D.

Now, a built-in GPS obviously has downsides. It eats into the battery, and obviously it adds to the weight and cost of the camera. So I can sort of understand why Canon would leave it out as I suspect it’s a bit of a niche feature.

But this is a review from my perspective, and I really miss the convenience of the feature.

Now, there are some workarounds of course for those, like me, who really loves to have their photos GPS tagged.

First, it’s possible to connect the camera to my smartphone using either a low energy Bluetooth connection or a WiFi connection, and pull location data from the smartphone which is added to images. This mostly works, but I do have to load the app on the smartphone to make sure it’s all connected, so it’s another thing to remember.

When the camera goes to sleep, sometimes the smartphone app closes, despite my best efforts to configure the phone not to do that. This loses the GPS connection and means I have to start over with launching the app.

Another option I could try would be to pick up Canon’s external GPS tagging unit, the GP-E2, which interfaces with the camera via the flash hot shoe and would solve the problem. Canon has since discontinued it, so that would mean the used market. But it’s another thing to buy and remember to pack, charge, and turn-on.

In general, the smartphone app seems to be working OK for me, so I will stick with that. It’s just another thing to have to remember.

 

Battery Life

That beautiful rear screen and electronic viewfinder are very impressive, but powering them definitely requires a significant amount of power. Add in in-body image stabilisation and the energy required to juice up that bogglingly fast autofocus system, and you are looking at a camera which eats batteries for breakfast.

This is definitely an area where rivals like Sony have the edge. The Sony a9 II for example has a battery life rating of 690 shots. The 6D I am used to has a battery life rating of a staggering 980 shots.

The EOS R5 is rated for 490 shots if you use the rear display, and only 320 shots if you use the viewfinder. And that’s only if you are using those in power saving modes. If you ramp up the refresh rate to its full performance, which you’ll want to do for fast moving subjects, the camera will punish you by dropping to a battery life of 320 on the rear screen and only 220 if you use the viewfinder. That is awful.

Of course, real world performance varies. If you are taking a lot of photos in sequence, say burst shots of wildlife photography, you’ll likely get many more photos out of it than that. However, get used to carrying more spare batteries if you are switching from say a DSLR.

With my 6D I’d easily be able to do a day or two or photography on one battery charge. With the R5, I’m yet to finish a full day without having to swap batteries at least once, and sometimes two or three times.

The bad news is that the battery, the LP-E6NH, is rather expensive. Canon has since replaced it with the LP-E6P, which works in the R5 with the latest firmware. The good news is that the R5 is backward compatible with the previous generations of Canon batteries, including the LP-E6N and even the LP-E6. So all my 6D batteries still work.

There are some caveats to using older batteries. They don’t last as long, and the super-fast burst speeds aren’t available. However, as I personally don’t need those ultra-fast burst speeds very often, my old batteries still work fine.

 

Learning Curve

You might think that having used Canon cameras for many years, that I’d be able to just pick up the R5 and start using it without trouble.

While that’s true to a point, and much of the interface is similar, there are quite a few differences between this camera and my previous DSLR cameras. If I had been coming from something like the EOS R, or even the 5D range, I suspect it might have felt more intuitive.

As it is, some of the buttons are not quite where I expect them to be, so I am having to retrain my muscle memory. In addition, whilst the camera is highly customisable, many of the buttons I got used to on my previous cameras like single-button access to settings for things like ISO, drive mode etc. aren’t there.

Instead, I have to either customise existing buttons, use the touch screen interface, or get used to pressing a sequence of buttons. It didn’t take long for me to get used to it, but it wasn’t a question of picking it up and being able to get the most out of it straight away.

This isn’t a major issue of course. Every camera has a slightly different way of doing things, and I suspect this will soon become second nature. However, for me, coming from a 6D, there has definitely been a learning curve in terms of getting to grips with quickly accessing key functions on the fly.

If you purchase this camera, or any new camera really, set some time aside to practice with it before heading on an important shoot. With the R5 in particular, you will want to spend time getting used to the various autofocus modes, and learning how to override them to select a focus point if necessary.

 

Price

There’s no denying it, the Canon EOS R5 is an expensive camera. The retail price of the camera on release was $3899 / £4299. However, prices have come down since it was released and you can find better deals. This has especially become the case since the release of the Mark II version of the camera in 2024. Check out the main online camera sellers like Amazon.com, B&H Photo, Adorama and Wex Photo Video to compare prices.

It has been out for long enough that you might also find a secondhand deal if you check the popular used camera stores like KEH and MPB, but the price difference might not be that great. However, if you trade in some older gear, you might get a good deal.

As a stills photographer, I am definitely paying for video features that I’m rarely likely to use. 8K video support in particular makes for nice headlines, but it’s not a feature I personally need.

Bear in mind too that you’re just buying a camera body. If you want some lenses to go with that camera, you’re looking at quite a bit more expenditure. A high megapixel camera like the R5 demands high quality glass, and good quality lenses tend to be expensive as well.

The good news is that all EF and EF-S lenses will also work with the camera with an adaptor, which means that if you already have a good collection of lenses, you don’t necessarily need to buy new lenses.

Over time the price of this camera will likely come down further. However, if it’s still out a bit too expensive, consider the Canon EOS R6 Mark III, Canon’s current mid-range full-frame camera, or the older R6 Mark II, which remains available for less. Both offer the majority of the features of the R5 at a much lower price point.

Update 2026: With the R5 now discontinued, pricing has changed significantly. New bodies now sell at a substantial discount and used copies go for less still, which makes the R5 a much easier recommendation than it was at launch. Canon has also since released the R6 Mark III (32.5MP, 40fps, 7K video) as the current mid-range option below the R5. See my updated R5 vs R5 Mark II comparison and alternatives section below for current buying advice.

 

Considerations When Buying the Canon EOS R5

There are a few things to think about when considering buying the Canon EOS  R5.

First, the high megapixel count. This has clear advantages, particularly if you plan on printing your work very large or if you tend to crop quite a bit.

However, a high megapixel sensor also has disadvantages. These include larger file sizes, and the fact that at higher megapixels, any movement is going to be exacerbated. That might be subject movement or movement due to hand shake. So you will want to get used to shooting at higher shutter speeds than you are currently using if you’re coming from a lower megapixel camera.

Traditionally, higher megapixel sensors have also tended to perform worse in low light and at higher ISOs. However I can confirm that this is definitely not the case with the R5, which performs admirably in low light. It produces perfectly usable images all the way up to 12800 ISO in my experience, and you can even push to higher ISOs if you really must.

Next, the size and weight. Many users thinking about switching to mirrorless from a DSLR system will likely have a reduced size and weight compared to a DSLR as a reason. And this can often be the case. However, whilst the EOS R5 is smaller and lighter than something like the EOS 5D Mark IV, it is by no means a small camera.

Here are some comparisons against my Canon EOS 6D, with the R5 on the left and the 6D on the right. As you can see, it’s a bit smaller, but it’s not a massive difference.

In terms of weight, the EOS R5 with card and battery comes in at 738g / 26oz. By comparison, my 6D is 770g / 27.1oz. However, as I have to use the EF-RF adaptor, which weight 110g (3.88oz), overall the R5 ends up weighing a bit more.

The R5 is also marginally larger and heavier than many other full frame mirrorless cameras, including the Sony a9 II and the Sony Alpha a7R IV.

Once you add a decent lens to any full-frame mirrorless camera, you’re not going to notice a few ounces of difference in body weight. Personally I love the size and feel of the R5. It doesn’t feel cramped in my hands and I can easily get to all the buttons.

 

Is the Canon EOS R5 Worth It?

The short answer to this question is yes (for me anyway). The longer answer is, it depends.

I would say that if you are looking for a camera that can handle pretty much every type of photography, this is it. I waited for a long time for Canon to release a camera that was compelling enough to justify an upgrade from my 6D, and I firmly believe the R5 is it. I’d also say it’s worth the upgrade from the 5D Mark IV, although this will of course depend on what you are shooting and whether the features are worth it for you.

Even though I won’t be using the 8K video features for the most part, I still firmly believe the R5 was worth the price. The autofocus, all round performance, and compatibility with all my existing lenses means it was definitely worth it for me.

If you make a living from your photography, this is a fantastic workhorse camera that should last you for years to come. It has a wonderful range of features, and delivers excellent images. This is a camera that will allow you to get on with the art of photography, and give you all the tools you need to get the results you want.

If you are just getting into photography or don’t need the higher megapixel count or 8K video, then I would suggest that the Canon EOS R6 Mark II would also be superb. This has nearly all the same features as the R5, but with a 24.1MP sensor and a slightly less weather sealed body. It even has a better battery life, improved autofocus system and faster burst rate. I’d suggest most users will be more than happy with it. It also comes at a much lower price tag!

If you’re trying to decide between the Canon EOS R5 and EOS R6 and wondering about the real-world difference between 45MP and 20MP, it’s not as great as you might think. Here is the same image shot from the same location with the same lens on my 6D and R5 to show you the difference.

 

 

As you can see, the 45MP sensor does give you a bit more latitude for cropping in, and the image at the equivalent zoom is sharper on the R5. Of course, this isn’t an apples to apples comparison, as I’m comparing an 8 year old sensor to something brand new.

I’d also suggest that it’s pretty rare to be zooming to 100% like this, and you can get around these limitations with a longer lens or simply moving closer to the subject where possible. It is nice to have the latitude to crop more if necessary.

 

Is the Canon EOS R5 Still Worth Buying in 2026?

This is the question I get asked more than any other right now, so let me give you a straight answer: yes, the original Canon EOS R5 is still very much worth buying in 2026, and in some ways it’s a better buy now than it was at launch.

Here’s why. The R5 was always a fantastic camera. What held some people back was the price. At launch, the body alone cost around $3,899 in the US. Today, with the R5 officially discontinued, you can pick up a new body at a steep discount, and used copies in excellent condition are regularly available for less still. That’s a remarkable amount of camera for the money.

The firmware has also matured considerably since launch. The early overheating concerns around 8K video recording have been addressed through multiple firmware updates, and the autofocus system has received meaningful improvements over the years. The camera I’m using today is noticeably better than the one I unboxed in 2021, despite being the same hardware.

Canon has confirmed they’ll continue to service the R5 well into the 2030s, so you’re not buying into a dead-end system. Every RF lens Canon makes (and will make) works with it. Your investment in lenses is completely future-proofed.

The main reason to consider the R5 Mark II instead is if you specifically need pre-capture (the ability to save frames from before you pressed the shutter), eye control autofocus, 30fps electronic shutter burst, or improved 8K video at 60fps. These are real upgrades, but for still photography and the kind of travel and wildlife work I do, the original R5 continues to deliver everything I need. I cover the specific differences in the R5 vs R5 Mark II comparison below.

If you’re coming from an older DSLR (anything from the Canon 6D, 7D, or 5D series), or from a crop-sensor mirrorless camera, the original R5 at its current price is a huge upgrade. If you already own an R5 and are wondering about the Mark II, I’d say hold onto your money unless one of those specific features is something you actually need for your work.

 

Canon EOS R5 vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon released the R5 Mark II in August 2024, and in early 2026 discontinued the original R5, making the Mark II the current production model. Having used the original R5 extensively, here’s how the two compare and whether the upgrade is worth it.

The R5 Mark II has the same 45MP resolution but uses a completely new stacked, back-illuminated sensor. This allows for faster readout speeds, which translates to 30fps electronic shutter (up from 20fps on the original), less rolling shutter distortion in video, and support for pre-capture, where the camera saves a buffer of frames from before you pressed the shutter button.

The autofocus system has been refined with improved subject detection, the ability to register and prioritize up to 10 specific people, and eye control AF that lets you select a focus point by looking at it through the viewfinder. The video capabilities have also been expanded, with 8K at up to 60fps and improved thermal management.

For my travel photography work, the key differences that would actually affect my shooting are:

Pre-capture would be really useful for wildlife, particularly for birds in flight where the moment you press the shutter is often a fraction of a second too late. This is probably the feature I’d appreciate most from the Mark II.

30fps burst speed is nice to have, but 12fps mechanical and 20fps electronic on the original R5 has been more than enough for every wildlife and action situation I’ve encountered. I’ve never felt limited by the burst speed on the original.

Eye control AF is an interesting technology, but reviews suggest it still requires calibration and isn’t always reliable. I’ve found the eye tracking, joystick and touchpad focus point selection on the original R5 to be fast and intuitive enough.

The R5 Mark II launched at around $4,299 and still sells for a good deal more, so you’re paying a significant premium over a new original R5, and more still over a used one. For that premium, you get real improvements, but they’re incremental rather than transformational.

If I were buying into the Canon system for the first time today with an unlimited budget, I’d get the Mark II. But if I were budget-conscious (which most of us are), the original R5 at its current pricing is one of the best value propositions in full-frame mirrorless cameras right now.

I expect to keep using my original R5 for years to come.

 

Canon EOS R5 Alternatives

With the original R5 now discontinued and the R5 Mark II as the current flagship, here are the main alternatives to consider across Canon’s RF lineup. I’ve included a range of price points, since not everyone needs a high-end camera body.

• Canon EOS R100 – right at the other end of Canon’s EOS R lineup is the R100. This is a fraction of the price of the R5, and a good entry-level mirrorless camera, offering great image quality.However you do lose a lot, the autofocus system can only detect people rather than animals and there’s no movable touch screen. Even so, as an entry-level mirrorless camera it is a fantastic option to learn with at a great price.
• Canon EOS R50 – a step above the R100, this camera improves on that model in a number of ways, including the addition of an articulating touch screen and a more advanced autofocus system that can also detect animals. If your budget stretches to it, I’d highly recommend this over the R100.
• Canon EOS R7 – this is Canon’s current flagship APS-C camera. It offers a fast burst rate of 30 fps a fully articulating touch screen, in-body image stabilisation and the same autofocus system as the R5 with subject detection. If you don’t need a full frame camera, this is a superb option to consider.
• Canon EOS R6 Mark III – the R6 Mark III is Canon’s current mid-range full-frame camera and the closest comparison to the R5. The main difference is the resolution, at 32.5MP compared to the 45MP of the R5, though that gap is smaller than it used to be and won’t matter for most uses. You still get in-body image stabilisation, 40 frames per second burst shooting (faster than the R5), an autofocus system that can identify all sorts of subjects, and 7K video. The older R6 Mark II (24.2MP) is also still widely available at a lower price if you want to save.
• Canon EOS R5 Mark II – released in 2024, the EOS R5 Mark II is the successor to the original, although you can still buy the original R5 and I’d argue it’s still very much worth buying as it’s a fantastic camera. Notable upgrades with the Canon R5 Mark II versus the original Canon R5 include an updated sensor, faster image processor allowing for higher burst rates, pre-shooting technology, and eye control autofocus. The image quality is pretty similar though, and I’d say unless you really need the new features, you’d be better off getting the original R5 and putting the savings towards a better lens.

Of course, there are more alternatives from a range of other brands to consider. You can see my guide to the best travel cameras for some more options to consider.

 

Where to Buy the Canon EOS R5

With the original R5 now discontinued, availability will become more limited over time. Here are the best places to find one in 2026:

New stock: At time of writing, the R5 body is still available new from Amazon and from specialist camera retailers. Prices for the body only have dropped well below the original launch price of $3,899.

Used and refurbished: The used market is well stocked with R5 bodies in excellent condition, often at a considerable saving. I’d recommend buying from reputable dealers like KEH. who offer a warranty on used equipment. Canon’s own refurbished store occasionally has R5 bodies available as well, though they sell out quickly.

R5 Mark II: If you decide the Mark II is the right choice, you can find it at Amazon and the major camera retailers.

You can also find Canon cameras and lenses at B&H Photo and Adorama. I’ve bought from both and they’re reliable sources for camera equipment.

Whichever retailer you choose, I wouldn’t wait too long if you want a new R5 body. Once existing stock is gone, new units won’t be manufactured.

 

Summary and Final Score

Overall I’m going to give the Canon EOS R5 4.8/5. It is a fantastic camera that works well in the majority of scenarios, making it a real work horse for photographers of all genres.

In an ideal world it wouldn’t be quite so expensive (although the price has come down since launch). Also, gimmicks like 8K video which push up the price but aren’t of value to the majority of users could have been left off the spec sheet.

But overall, this is an excellent bit of equipment that should last you for years to come. If you are a Canon user who has been waiting to make the move from a DSLR to mirrorless, this is the camera that should convince you now is the time to do so.

Update March 2026: Canon has officially discontinued the original R5, making this camera an even better value as prices have dropped significantly. After five years of daily use across safaris, landscapes, city shoots and everything in between, the R5 remains my primary camera and I’ve no plans to replace it. If you’re considering one at current prices, I wouldn’t hesitate.

 

Further Reading

That just about wraps up my Canon EOS R5 review. Before you go, I wanted to share some more resources that you might find useful in your photography journey.

• I have a review of the Peak Design camera strap system as well as the Peak Design travel tripod
• We have a guide to how to use a compact camera, how to use a DSLR camera, and how to use a mirrorless camera. We also have a guide to how a DSLR works
• Knowing how to compose a great photo is a key photography skill. See our guide to composition in photography for lots of tips on this subject
• We have a guide to what depth of field is and when you would want to use it.
• We are big fans of getting the most out of your digital photo files, and do to that you will need to shoot in RAW. See our guide to RAW in photography to understand what RAW is, and why you should switch to RAW as soon as you can if your camera supports it.
• We have a guide to the best photo editing applications which includes both paid and free options
• You’re going to need something to run your photo editing software on. See our guide to the best laptops for photo editing for some tips on what to look for.
• Colour accuracy is important for photography. See our guide to monitor calibration to ensure your screen is set up correctly.
• If you’re looking for a great gift for a photography loving friend or family member (or yourself!), take a look at our photography gift guide,
• If you’re in the market for a new camera, we have a detailed guide to the best travel cameras, as well as specific guides for the best cameras for hiking and backpacking, the best compact camera, best bridge camera, best mirrorless camera and best DSLR camera. We also have a guide to the best camera lenses.
• If you want a camera or lens, but the prices are a bit high, see our guide to where to buy used cameras and camera gear for some budget savings options.
• We have a guide to why you need a tripod, a guide to choosing a travel tripod, and a round-up of our favourite travel tripods
• If you’re looking for more advice on specific tips for different scenarios, we also have you covered. See our guides to Northern Lights photography, long exposure photography, fireworks photography, tips for taking photos of stars, taking photos in snow, and cold weather photography.
• Finally, if you want to take your photography to the next level, check out my online photography course!

And that’s it! As always we’re always open to hearing your feedback and answering your questions.

If you’ve tried out this camera, would love to hear your own thoughts below! If you have any questions about the Canon EOS R5 or about selecting a mirrorless camera in general, just pop them in the comments below and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions About the Canon EOS R5

Is the Canon EOS R5 discontinued?

Yes, Canon officially discontinued the original EOS R5 in early 2026, replacing it with the R5 Mark II. However, the R5 is still widely available from retailers and on the used market at reduced prices, and Canon will continue to service and repair the R5 well into the 2030s.

Is the Canon EOS R5 still worth buying in 2026?

Yes. At its current price point, well below where it launched, the R5 is one of the best values in full-frame mirrorless cameras. The 45MP sensor, class-leading autofocus, and in-body image stabilisation are still excellent by 2026 standards. I’ve used mine professionally for five years and it continues to be my primary camera.

What is the difference between the Canon R5 and R5 Mark II?

The R5 Mark II has a new stacked sensor that enables 30fps burst shooting (vs 20fps), pre-capture capability, eye control autofocus, and improved 8K video at 60fps. Image quality and resolution are comparable at 45MP. The Mark II costs a good deal more than the original at current prices. For still photography, the improvements are incremental rather than transformational.

Is the Canon EOS R5 good for wildlife photography?

The R5 is excellent for wildlife photography. The subject detection autofocus can track animals’ eyes, heads and bodies, and works reliably with both RF and adapted EF telephoto lenses. I’ve used it extensively on safari in East Africa for lions, leopards, gorillas, birds in flight and more. The 12fps mechanical shutter and 20fps electronic shutter are fast enough for virtually any wildlife scenario.

Can I use my Canon EF lenses on the R5?

Yes. The R5 uses the RF lens mount, but with Canon’s EF-EOS R mount adaptor, all Canon EF and EF-S lenses work perfectly. Performance is just as good as on a DSLR body, and in many cases better thanks to the R5’s superior autofocus system and in-body image stabilisation. Third-party EF mount lenses from Sigma and Tamron also work with the adaptor.

How does the Canon R5 battery life compare to a DSLR?

Battery life is noticeably shorter than a DSLR. The R5 is rated for around 320-490 shots depending on settings, compared to 980 shots for my old Canon 6D. I typically get through two to three batteries on a full day of wildlife shooting. The good news is that the R5 is compatible with older LP-E6N and LP-E6 batteries, so if you’re coming from a Canon DSLR you can reuse your existing battery collection.

Should I buy the Canon R5 or the R6 Mark II?

If resolution is important to you (for cropping, large prints, or commercial work), the R5’s 45MP sensor has a clear advantage over the R6 Mark II’s 24.2MP. If you prioritise burst speed and don’t need the extra resolution, the R6 Mark II offers 40fps and costs less. Both have excellent autofocus. For my travel and wildlife photography, I prefer the R5’s higher resolution because it gives me more flexibility to crop in post-processing.